Rep. André Carson (D-IN), chairman of the subcommittee, opened the hearing. He raised the concern that UAPs posed a potential threat to national security and should be treated as such, and that the “stigma associated with UAPs has gotten in the way of good intelligence analysis.” He criticized the Pentagon for failing to name a director to head the newly established Airborne Object Identification and Management Synchronization Group and for failing to provide any updates. Carson pledged to "bring the organization out of the shadows.”[6]
The hearings included testimony from Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security Ronald S. Moultrie, the Pentagon’s top intelligence official, and Deputy Director of Naval Intelligence Scott Bray. Bray stated that the number of “frequent and continuing” reported sightings had grown to about 400 since last year’s mandated report.[7][8][9] He cast out the notion that the UFOs had extraterrestrial origins, testifying that no organic/inorganic material or unexplainable wreckage indicated so.[6][10] Bray added that there had been no attempts at communication with the objects, and that despite at least 11 “near-misses”, no collisions between unidentified aircraft and U.S. aircraft had been reported so far.[11][12]
It was revealed that other countries had similar reports on UFOs, and that a number of them communicated with U.S. intelligence agencies, although Moultrie told lawmakers that they did want “potential adversaries to know exactly what we see or understand.”[6] He also mentioned the need for cooperation with the Federal Aviation Administration as well as other government agencies.[9] Moultrie stated that most UFOs could be identified through “rigorous” analysis and investigation, but pointed out a number of incidents that defied explanation, such as a 2004 sighting where aircraft carrier pilots in the Pacific came across a hovering unidentified object that appeared to have rapidly descended tens of thousands of feet.[7][13][14]
Lawmakers were shown declassified images and footage of UFOs, including a video of a UFO observed by a Navy fighter-jet pilot in 2021, a “spherical object” that “quickly passes by the cockpit of the aircraft.” Another video captured triangular objects (speculated to be drones) floating off the coast as seen through night-vision goggles.[6][7][15]
A number of lawmakers, including Rick Crawford (R-AR), expressed concerns about potential Russian or Chinese hypersonic weapons programs.[6][16] He warned that a failure to identify such threats was “tantamount to intelligence failure that we certainly want to avoid”.[16]
The standardization of the civilian reporting process was also discussed, as the majority of reports in the military’s database are from military officers.
The public portion of the hearing, held in the morning and lasting less than 90 minutes, was followed by private classified session in the afternoon.[16][6]
pretty mild for people saying at some point there was hard evidence dropped ufo means extraterrestrials. Sounds more like unidentifiable flying objects encounters report. No green man here.
If you just want the dry version of all this, there is of course a wikipedia page for that hearing.
pretty mild for people saying at some point there was hard evidence dropped ufo means extraterrestrials. Sounds more like unidentifiable flying objects encounters report. No green man here.