• DrRatso@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wouldn’t the price go up irrespective of which side you tax it on? Obviously if this is a megacorp, they could spread it out over unrelated products, but in the end its not like theyll roll over, take the corporate tax and leave the product at the old price. Is it being a poor tax even that bad of a thing? This is not a necessity and poor people are generally going to be the ones that suffer from poor diet / lifestyle choices in very big part due to the price/calorie aspect of junkfood et al. Lets be real, if you buy a bar once a week, 1.29->3.29 is not a big deal.

    Also, we do have tax on sugarry soft drinks in the EU (atleast my country), it is just laughably small compared to EtOH and tobacco). I personally always have thought that anything with added sugar beyond a certain amount should get a heavy tax, conditional on this tax being funneled into healthcare / public health programs.

    • Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Wouldn’t the price go up irrespective of which side you tax it on?

      Not necessarily, companies might just stop putting sugar where it doesn’t belong. They do it right now because corn syrup is free and why don’t just put it everywhere.

        • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I wanted to like stevia when I first tried it, but I find it has a chemical taste, maybe leftover solvents from the extraction process. But it tastes like aspartame to me, which also tastes awful.

          I’d be happy with just less sugar used. Shit doesn’t need to be so sweet.