• HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Pick one. Otherwise you aren’t better than alt-right people on Facebook that say to “do your own research”.

      • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Right, but you’re no better than alt-right people on Facebook ignoring the research that’s literally one click away because you’re afraid it will disagree with you

          • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            FYI, none of your posts in this thread have any links

            And because jfc you’re lazy: Here is a study by the Harvard Business Review showing increased productivity.

            It took three clicks from Google so I can see why you’d have trouble getting to it.

            • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              This source just states that there is a disagreement over whether work from home is more or less productive and provides survey information to show the difference in opinion.

              That isn’t making the argument that remote work is productive, just that workers view it as more productive and the study isn’t conclusive. The closest this study gets to saying if productivity increases is “In theory, both sides could be right[.]”

            • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’ve been posting the Economist link in several comments. I left it as presented to show where the link came from in case people argued with the source.