Ignores salient points made

I’ve responded to them, not ignored them.

what-about-isms to reassert bad point

I’ve said that, if you want to argue the studies presented, present other studies. The only one presented I had comments on and quoted the text.

doubles down on the science is a competition thing while illustrating complete lack of knowledge of scientific process

Science is about presenting data in a way that can be reviewed and verified. I’ve asked for studies that back up the assertions made while providing references to my assertions. Where is the data to back up the claim that remote work is more productive?