• 6mementomori@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    25
    ·
    1 year ago

    the message here is ambiguous. are those 1164 arbitrary bela/russians or they’re actual threats that happened to be bela/russian. that being said, if one thinks we should just kick people out because they were from the wrong country, just know y’all are becoming Nazis. this shit is scarier than you think. now that the precedent of kicking them out has been set, what’s the next line?

    • betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      63
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      If only there was a news story that provided additional information on why those individuals were selected out of the ~58,000 Belarusian and ~16,000 Russian citizens living in Lithuania.

    • Blackout@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why let the propaganda into your home? If every nation did this it would increase pressure back in Russia. If they are actively attacking an innocent state then why should their people get a vacation?

        • Cabrio@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Russian’s living elsewhere but actively stating they support Russia, they like Russia so much we’re letting them go back.

    • Prandom_returns@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      They were being questioned whether they support war, how the war started, what Crimea belongs to, thoughts about the soviet union.

      If they’re moronic enough to not lie, their temporary permit is no longer extended.

              • monk@lemmy.unboiled.info
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Sure, videocalling with one right now. That’s not what I’ve been discussing, I was highlighting the suboptimal wording that suggested there were none.

                • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I’m confused about what your confused about. They were asked if they support the war, if they don’t support the war then by default they are Pro Ukrainian. Everything else is just about degrees of support.

                  • monk@lemmy.unboiled.info
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    They wrote “they were asked about [their views]… those who were moronic enough not to lie, were deported”, which reads as “not lied => deported” to me. Let’s break it down:

                    Pro-Kremlin, lied = no claims; not deported, I guess.

                    Pro-Kremlin, not lied = claims they are deported; understandable.

                    Pro-Ukrainian, lied = no claims; wtf tho.

                    Pro-Ukrainian, not lied = claims they are deported; that’d be stupid.

                    Am I clear enough now?

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      now that the precedent of kicking them out has been set, what’s the next line?

      Just so you know that is called the slippery slope fallacy.

      Just because one person did thing x and then did thing y, and think y was bad. It does not mean that everyone who does thing x inevitably is going to do thing y

      You have to provide a little more evidence than the Nazis did it.