• ErwinLottemann@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          i usually set the limit to 10MB and tell the users to fuck off when they want to send something bigger. there are more convenient methods to transfer larger files.

        • Red@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ah! How interesting… work$ has been a Google shop for a while thus the 25m limit. Good work for o365 to enable the increase.

          Email is such a fickle system. I couldn’t imagine mobiles downloading 150m attachments when they only have a few GB of space…

          Maybe im just too old…

          • Unaware7013@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Yeah, the big use I’ve seen for the max size limit was sending cad drawings to/from vendors and clients. No mobile usage involved, just big files that needed transmitted to allow jobs to progress.

          • SnipingNinja@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            With 128 already the most common storage size and 256 becoming that in the next few years, I don’t think a few GBs of free space is right

            • Red@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I agree. It’s just I forget that people use IMAP and choose to not download their data to their devices and leave it on servers that they don’t control. 🤷

              Also at 150mb, and maybe a 10gb storage allowance it doesn’t leave much room for the actual text content 😂