• electrogamerman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    It is banning a religious ideal imposed by an opressive reliegion. It has anything to do with not becoming a dictatorship.

    This is how a dictatorship look like: “Iranian Enginner who protested forced hijab sentenced to 74 lashes”

    • NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      You’re still not actually supporting that claim. I guess this is what it looks like when you haven’t reasoned your way into a position.

      By the way, there’s a reason democracies tend to value freedom of religion.

        • NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Seriously, this is the best you came up with? Technically being Muslim isn’t banned in China either. Preventing people from harmlessly practicing their religion is also against freedom of religion.

          • electrogamerman@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago
            1. Who is preventing Muslims to practice their religion?

            2. Enforcing a sexist, misogynistic, ancient ideal that women need to cover their body for men to not to be tempted is in no way “harmless”

            • NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Who is preventing Muslims to practice their religion?

              Hijab is part of Islam so… There’s your answer.

              Enforcing a sexist, misogynistic, ancient ideal that women need to cover their body for men to not to be tempted is in no way “harmless”

              Miss me with your white savior bullshit, Muslim women are perfectly capable of thinking for themselves, so when they ask for hijab to be banned you can say that.

              • DarthBueller@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                If muslim women are free to think for themselves, why do muslim men beat and murder them so often?

              • electrogamerman@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                women are perfectly capable of thinking for themselves, so when they ask for hijab to be banned you can say that.

                And we come back to the original post. See how this is related now? :)

                “White savior bullshit”, funny.

                • NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  And we come back to the original post. See how this is related now? :)

                  Nobody is asking for a hijab ban. They’re asking for forced hijab to be lifted WTF are you even high on?

                • solstice@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  There are SO MANY contrarian assholes on lemmy it’s just staggering. You found another one congrats. I’ll hypocritically suggest you disengage, although they’re fun to poke with sticks.

                  Personally I’m convinced they are chatbots designed to drive engagement and increase posting. At least I hope so, because the alternative is that all the assholes and morons on this site are real actual people and that’s a super depressing thought.

                  • NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    I was actually gonna do that after the next reply. I’m mainly hoping someone who’s on the fence or who doesn’t know much about the topic sees this exchange and change their minds. The people who actually say shit like this out loud are hopeless.

    • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I was told that it was a ban on all religious symbols and it wasn’t a targetted attack on a minority group. Now you are saying it is targeted.

      Are we doing the “say the quite part loud” now?