• lolcatnip@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hooray, a Persian Gulf country sentenced someone to a punishment other than death for a harmless crime!

    • milkjug@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m very surprised at you getting mass downvoted.

      Their current plight goes all the way back to the 70s, where they literally got everything they wanted.

      The Shah deposed, check. Carter humiliated and out of office, check. Religious oligarchy / theocracy / Islamic fundamentalism and Khomeini in power, check. Reagan elected, check. The US embarrassed and shamed, check.

      Nothing good it seems come out of getting involved in the affairs of the Middle East.

  • ColorcodedResistor@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    so much fuss over a hat,please muslims, make it make sense. why is it a female’s job to worry about your stupid ass erections?

  • TheBlue22@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Fucking backward religion. So much would be better without any religion whatsoever

      • NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        As a Muslim, I’ll say two things:

        1-“Religion of peace” is a word made up by right-wing Islamophobes so they can hate on Islam more. Islam never claims to be a “religion of peace”, though peace is valued highly in Islam.

        2-What Iran is doing is at best tangentially related to Islam. They’re a dictatorship, plain and simple.

        • zikk_transport2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          2-What Iran is doing is at best tangentially related to Islam. They’re a dictatorship, plain and simple.

          Are you trying to tell that Iran has nothing to do with Islam? Is hijab has nothing to do with Islam? Or is Iran following wrong/different kind of Islam? I always thought that there is one Islam, not multiple Islams.

          • NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Are you trying to tell that Iran has nothing to do with Islam? Is hijab has nothing to do with Islam?

            Lashing people for saying things you don’t like has nothing to do with Islam.

            Or is Iran following wrong/different kind of Islam?

            Iran is Shia so since I’m Sunni my answer would be yes, but that’s not what you’re asking. An asshole that uses Islam as an excuse doesn’t indict Islam as a whole. Or it does, in which case we could use China and the USSR to say a lot about atheism.

            • zikk_transport2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Lashing people for saying things you don’t like has nothing to do with Islam.

              You changed topic. Lashes were due to religious beliefs. Period.

              An asshole that uses Islam as an excuse doesn’t indict Islam as a whole

              So it’s still islam. Islam is a religion just like any other religion. Everyone interprets it differently and that’s fine. Everyone explains it differently, the way each person unferstands it, so it’s still Islam.

              we could use China and the USSR to say a lot about atheism.

              Atheism is not a religion in the first place. In fact, your example could be used in different way - people in China and USSR drank water and ate food. So drinking water and eating food makes us somewhat comparable to China and USSR?

        • Croquette@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          But it seems that when religion is intermixed with politics, it inevitably leads to dictatorships or regressive government.

          At one point, where is the separation? I get that dictatorships also happen without religion, but it seems that religious parties in power inevitably bring a regressive agenda with them.

          • NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I’d say that this is an example of correlation vs causation (nowadays the conditions that are likely to produce religious governments are also exceedingly likely to produce dictatorships), but either way that’s not what I’m talking about.

            The point is: There’s nothing in Islam justifying the shit they’re doing in Iran. At times like these people tend to forget that Middle Eastern cultures themselves are quiet sexist, and are many times actually held back by Islam, speaking as a Middle Eastern guy. That aside, this is a dictatorship that’s using Islam to give itself legitimacy; Islam itself doesn’t support this kind of behavior in the slightest, and most Muslims don’t either.

            • Croquette@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              I understand that Islam doesn’t support anything like that in the scriptures, just like many other religions.

              But religion has been used for milleniums as a cover for atrocious actions. At this point, they are not separable. So when is it enough?

              Religion is inherently conservative. And we see everyday what conservatism does to the planet and the society.

              • NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                But religion has been used for milleniums as a cover for atrocious actions. At this point, they are not separable. So when is it enough?

                But don’t non-religious dictatorships also commit atrocious actions? In the end a cover is just that: a cover.

                • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  But don’t non-religious dictatorships also commit atrocious actions?

                  Just because people die from heart attacks doesn’t mean cancer does not kill.

        • spez_@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ban religion. In my eyes, those who are religious are terrorists

        • Duxon@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Many Muslim leaders have called Islam a religion of peace. For example, the former Grand Imam of Al-Azhar, Ahmed el-Tayeb, has said that “Islam is a religion of peace and tolerance” and that “it is against all forms of violence and terrorism.” The current Grand Imam, Ahmed al-Tayyib, has also said that “Islam is a religion of peace and love” and that “it is against all forms of violence and extremism.”

          Other Muslim leaders who have called Islam a religion of peace include the former King Abdullah II of Jordan, the former President of Indonesia Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono, and the former Prime Minister of Malaysia Mahathir Mohamad.

          • NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Calling Islam a religion of peace and calling it the “religion of peace” as a name are different things. Peace is valued highly in Islam, but it’s not defined by it.

            • Duxon@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I keep it as Ricky Gervais once put it: for a true religion of peace, the most extreme followers would be extremely peaceful.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Christianity calls itself a religion of peace as well. I’m with @TheBlue22. The problem isn’t just Islam, it’s religion as a whole.

          • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Could just be emergent. I don’t know if humans have a religious drive it could just be we have certain ways our minds tend to break.

        • zikk_transport2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Indeed. All religions are bad. All religions teach that anyone who do not follow your religion is bad and is basically your enemy. 🤷

          • electrogamerman@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            It is banning a religious ideal imposed by an opressive reliegion. It has anything to do with not becoming a dictatorship.

            This is how a dictatorship look like: “Iranian Enginner who protested forced hijab sentenced to 74 lashes”

            • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I was told that it was a ban on all religious symbols and it wasn’t a targetted attack on a minority group. Now you are saying it is targeted.

              Are we doing the “say the quite part loud” now?

            • NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              You’re still not actually supporting that claim. I guess this is what it looks like when you haven’t reasoned your way into a position.

              By the way, there’s a reason democracies tend to value freedom of religion.

                • NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Seriously, this is the best you came up with? Technically being Muslim isn’t banned in China either. Preventing people from harmlessly practicing their religion is also against freedom of religion.

  • yrmyli@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    A religion where women are beaten and people are blown up for fun. Islam is like a cancer of all modern religions. I must check how many down votes I get in next 12h.

    • NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      A religion where women are beaten and people are blown up for fun.

      I’ll just say that we (well most of us) also hate the people who do these things. I’ll also say that you’re a bigot.

      • zikk_transport2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Women is generally treated like trash in Islam. Women who follow Islam also like to be treated like trash. It’s part of the Islam. Oh yeah, tell me how in Islam it is believed that women is unsafe without it’s men. This religion is sexist as fuck.

        The only valid option muslims would do is to drop any religion and be atheists. Atheism is the only “religion” where you follow your morals and not some fantasy book written by some randoms.

    • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Oh none from me, though I’d pool just about every other religion in with that. They’re all shit in their own ways. The concept of a modern religion also makes no sense, by their nature religions are archaic power tools used to control the masses against their individual will via their collective will.

    • Rootiest@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      cancer of all modern religions

      Meh, they’re all pretty bad imo

      Modern Religion is an oxymoron

    • reagansrottencorpse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s actually really interesting. I wonder if any religious folks are able to deconstruct their own beliefs after seeing this movement.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    1 year ago

    I am so sad that the mass protests had no effect. Poor Iranian people, especially women. What can anyone do to free them?

    • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Conservatism is a global plague. Pacifism has never worked to cure this disease. Until the normal people rise up and do the horrific dirty work needed to erase this disease, it will continue to infect and kill.

      The cure is not clean, but history has proven that conservatism is a fatal disease when left untreated.

      • giacomo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        If the cure for violence is more violence, are you really solving anything?

        • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I’m aware. And I am heart-broken. The violence, unfortunately, must involve not stopping until the conservatives no longer exist in any position of power. Extreme violence with a lack of mercy may be required. I don’t think the Iranian people really have that in them. I hope I am proven wrong some day. This government was foisted upon them by us. This conservative government was not entirely the people’s fault in this case.

          For the rest of us, wherever the conservative disease persists, the natural result will always be brutal oppression of the vulnerable. Always. A cure must be administered long before the disease becomes this advanced.

    • DarthBueller@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I was heartened to hear about the people keeping up the public opposition of the clerics, beyond knocking off their turbans. I hope that the clerics understand that their time is passing and that they are shaking in their sandals with the very realistic fear that they will continue to get randomly gunned down by the people anytime an opportunity presents it. Fuck theocratic Islam and all other exclusivist religions.

      Even the Gulanist movement from Turkey, who likes to put on a friendly face to the western world, is exclusivist – if pressed, their real opinions come through their strategic friendly face da’wah, e.g., it is not hard to get them to call Sufis (one of the few mystical/not-exclusivist islamic groups) heretics or “not real muslims.”

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Lashes is for the lucky ones.

      The less lucky ones get hanged. And if you think hanged as in a quick drop and neck snap, no. They hang you slowly with a crane so that you suffer more, that is required by Darth vader the ayatollah…

      Fuck everything about those religious zealot nut cases

  • carl_dungeon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    1 year ago

    Iran should just deport all their engineers, philosophers, critical thinkers, social unacceptable members to other countries that would be glad to receive a brain boost. That way, Iran could just happily fucking rot in its own juices.

  • solstice@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Holy shit is 74 lashes even survivable?? I feel like it would flay the flesh off his back and never recover, die from infection or something. Not a doctor and not a torturer so idk.

    • aksdb@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      From what I understand they can stretch that over multiple sessions. No idea if they have a fixed set of lashes per session or if they simply stop when a doctor signals it gets problematic and continue when the wounds have somewhat started to heal.

    • NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Obligatory what Iran is doing makes no fucking sense.

      That aside, lashing in Islam doesn’t mean lashing with all your strength and ripping the flesh off the guy you’re lashing. There are a lot of restrictions to make the process painful, but survivable without permanent injuries.

      • DarthBueller@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Fuck any religion that posits death or beating for anyone. Fuck any religion that teaches women are subservient to men. I don’t give a flying fuck about “a lot of restrictions” – fuck this brutal religion.

          • DarthBueller@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’d rather see the clerical leadership publicly executed for their crimes against humanity and Iranians be free from the boot of oppression.

          • Empricorn@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Uh, I’m upset about religions that teach people women are not worthy of being on the same level as men. I’m upset that certain countries beat the crap out of people to dissuade then from opposing the decisions of their ruling oligarchs…

            *typos

    • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      every religious-led country is a country of barbarians.

      it is the human collective absolving themselves of responsibility in liue of some greater power

      religion is a transmissible poison that must be removed, like cigarettes