• electrogamerman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        It is banning a religious ideal imposed by an opressive reliegion. It has anything to do with not becoming a dictatorship.

        This is how a dictatorship look like: “Iranian Enginner who protested forced hijab sentenced to 74 lashes”

        • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I was told that it was a ban on all religious symbols and it wasn’t a targetted attack on a minority group. Now you are saying it is targeted.

          Are we doing the “say the quite part loud” now?

        • NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          You’re still not actually supporting that claim. I guess this is what it looks like when you haven’t reasoned your way into a position.

          By the way, there’s a reason democracies tend to value freedom of religion.

            • NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              1 year ago

              Seriously, this is the best you came up with? Technically being Muslim isn’t banned in China either. Preventing people from harmlessly practicing their religion is also against freedom of religion.

              • electrogamerman@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago
                1. Who is preventing Muslims to practice their religion?

                2. Enforcing a sexist, misogynistic, ancient ideal that women need to cover their body for men to not to be tempted is in no way “harmless”

                • NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Who is preventing Muslims to practice their religion?

                  Hijab is part of Islam so… There’s your answer.

                  Enforcing a sexist, misogynistic, ancient ideal that women need to cover their body for men to not to be tempted is in no way “harmless”

                  Miss me with your white savior bullshit, Muslim women are perfectly capable of thinking for themselves, so when they ask for hijab to be banned you can say that.

                  • DarthBueller@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    If muslim women are free to think for themselves, why do muslim men beat and murder them so often?

                  • electrogamerman@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    6
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    women are perfectly capable of thinking for themselves, so when they ask for hijab to be banned you can say that.

                    And we come back to the original post. See how this is related now? :)

                    “White savior bullshit”, funny.