Australians have resoundingly rejected a proposal to recognise Aboriginal people in its constitution and establish a body to advise parliament on Indigenous issues.

Saturday’s voice to parliament referendum failed, with the defeat clear shortly after polls closed.

  • Gerula@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    But aren’t Aboriginal people citizens of Australia and so already part of the Constitution thus having legal rights like everyone else? What are the extra rights and representation needed?

    • DessertStorms@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      37
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      But aren’t Aboriginal people citizens of Australia and so already part of the Constitution thus having legal rights like everyone else?

      No, obviously not.

      What are the extra rights and representation needed?

      Basic human rights and equal representation, for starters.

      How about instead of spending your time here making such outlandishly ignorant comments, you spend it instead looking up for yourself how Aboriginal people are treated, and what equal rights they’re fighting for?, rather than sit back and demand others do the work for you?

      • Spzi@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Another way to view it: It’s not about the individual person you’re replying to. Even unreasonable questions are a chance to bring more quality content into the thread, so more people can see it. It’s a chance to highlight things you value. It also makes nicer answers.

    • Ilandar@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      What are the extra rights and representation needed?

      Because they are Indigenous. Do you understand the difference between Indigenous and non-Indigenous peoples in a colonial state?