• angrystego@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s not just about systems, It’s about conditions. Certain conditions make certain strategies more profitable - see game theory. I think low population density and hard life conditions cam lead to kindness being among the winning strategies.

      • Flumsy@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah well we dont have any of those conditions and it would make sense to make oue life conditions harder or to lower the population density so drastically so this meme doesnt make any sense

        • Grayox@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          So why not have a system specifically designed to mitigate greed in lieu of one that incentivizes it?

          • Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            Because with capitalism, the greed is out in the open. Everyone understands it. It is clear and legal to push against the greed of those who have more.

            In a system that incentivizes “virtues”, greed eill hide behind those virtues. And when you then fight against that greed, then you are accused of attacking those virtues instead.

      • interolivary@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I’m a leftist but I’m not much of a fan of the Soviet Union. I’m Finnish and middle-aged so I know a bunch of people who had to escape from there and I’ve heard first-hand stories about the shit that went on, and I’ve visited Soviet Estonia who got the short end of the stick with Russian imperialism compared to us. At least we stayed independent although had to grant a lot of power over eg. our foreign policy to the Russians – ie. Soviets, but it’s not like it wasn’t essentially a Russian project since they pretty quickly forgot about korenization and went for Russification instead – to keep them from invading (again…)

      • whoisearth@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Jokes aside communism is just as bad because it does nothing to prevent power from congregating at the top. The only difference is the type of corruption.

        Talk to anyone who grew up in the eastern block about bread lines. Communism is a failure in comparison to capitalism.

          • Rediphile@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            The only real solution is intentional population control. But I don’t have high hopes we ever get there though.

            Everyone could have way more resources than we’d ever want to even use. But instead, we seem focused on maxing out the world population leaving the least amount possible for each person.

        • BarrelAgedBoredom@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          23
          ·
          1 year ago

          Check out The Dawn of Everything, puts to rest a lot of the myths about prehistoric societies that we tell ourselves. Early societies were consciously experimenting with different social arrangements and they were far more peaceful and egalitarian than we usually give them credit for. Their ideas on property were vastly different than ours as well. There wasn’t really an “our hunting grounds” to speak of. If you’re interested I’ll leave this video by Andrewism about human history. It’s well sourced and pretty informative

          • Lesrid@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            Turns out to have warring tribes you need to be organized enough to carry out a war.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Jericho had walls when most of the rest of humanity was nomadic hunter-gatherers.

            City walls generally weren’t built because people feel safe and secure already.

            • rchive@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I think it sort of depends on what time period we’re talking about. Jericho and other walled cities came about after a certain point. By then, there certainly were societies that lived off raiding the less nomadic agrarian societies, not very peaceful or egalitarian.

      • Grayox@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        The Agrarian Revolution really was where humanity started going downhill.

    • Holzkohlen@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Some veil of ignorance everyone is part of the ruling class for a week type stuff? Or maybe just anarcho syndicalism.