• rbesfe@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    27
    ·
    1 year ago

    There’s a reason that “don’t negotiate with terrorists” is a good rule to follow

    • demonsword@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      indeed it is, makes me wonder why any country still has any dealings with Israel at this point

      • DarkGamer@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        25
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Which side is taking hostages? Which side slaughtered, raped, and kidnapped civilians without even claiming they were going after military targets? Hint: not Israel. If you have the stomach, watch this uncensored Oct 7 footage (warning: blood, gore, and death,) and tell me the ones responding to this are the real terorists, and who has the moral high ground. Note how they shoot people trying to surrender and any civilians they happen to come across.

        How does one get such a twisted worldview?

        • timidgoat@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Israel actually have thousands of “prisoners”, many of which are being held indefinitely without charges or trial. Usually when someone is being held against their will, without reason we call them a hostage. Israel has abducted more Palestinians during the “truce” than they have released. Israel is also seemingly responsible for many of the deaths of Israeli civilians on the 7th of October, including shooting people exiting homes in kibbutzim at the orders of the army.If you want to start sharing graphic, gory, NSFL videos, I have countless videos of Palestinian children without limbs, intact skulls, you name it. No one here is defending Hamas killing civilians. But they difference is that unlike you, we are not defending Israel killing thousands of civilians. The IOF is a terrorist army.

          • DarkGamer@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            20
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Israel actually have thousands of “prisoners”, many of which are being held indefinitely without charges or trial.

            That’s war; stay belligerent after defeat, be subjected to your enemy’s military courts. They still get more due process than the hostages did.

            Israel is also seemingly responsible for many of the deaths of Israeli civilians on the 7th of October, including shooting people exiting homes in kibbutzim at the orders of the army

            Friendly fire exists therefore terrorism? Please.

            No one here is defending Hamas killing civilians.

            You are attempting to justify Hamas when you imply Israel is the greater evil, calling them the terrorists.

            unlike you, we are not defending Israel killing thousands of civilians. The IOF is a terrorist army.

            That’s what happens when you start a war, civilians die as collateral damage. Responding to an organized attack by a hostile government is not terrorism. Not responding is foolish.

            • Maggoty@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              14
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              No, that’s a war crime. Military courts are only allowed to do the minimal required to maintain order against things like looting. And they must return the justice system to local hands as soon as possible.

              54 years is a war crime when that measurement is supposed to be in months at the most.

              • DarkGamer@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                15
                ·
                1 year ago

                No, that’s a war crime. Military courts are only allowed to do the minimal required to maintain order against things like looting.

                Citation?

                And they must return the justice system to local hands as soon as possible. … 54 years is a war crime when that measurement is supposed to be in months at the most.

                While the enemy remains belligerent? It’s clearly not yet possible. Palestine has been trying to kill the Jews for at least 70 years and have yet to pacify themselves. That’s what needs to happen for them to have autonomy for such things.

                • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  12
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  You’re either in control or you’re not. You don’t get to have so much control that you can arrest people but then throw your hands up and say it’s a war zone.

                  And don’t act like Israel’s hands are clean. They used terrorism to get rid of the British troops and pursue the original Nakba. White washing that with some “they just hate us” propaganda is bullshit.

                  So you have a choice. It’s either a war crime or Apartheid. You’re either in control or you’re not.

                  Edit- I’m sorry I forgot the citation for you. It’s called the Geneva Convention.

                  • DarkGamer@kbin.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    11
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    You’re either in control or you’re not. You don’t get to have so much control that you can arrest people but then throw your hands up and say it’s a war zone.

                    The world isn’t as binary as you seem to think it is. Clearly they are doing both, so they can. Control ebbs and flows and can be gained and lost, and can be at values other than 100% or 0%.

                    And don’t act like Israel’s hands are clean.

                    I’m not. There’s plenty of blood on everyone’s hands in a conflict that has gone on this long. Google irgun to see the worst of it. Still, I find Israel to be by far the more sympathetic party. They haven’t behaved that way since the Jews became a nation and Israel’s civil rights record is far better than those who oppose them today.

                    They used terrorism to get rid of the British troops

                    Arabs also used unlawful violence against the British.

                    and pursue the original Nakba.

                    …said land losses were the result of declaring war on Israel in '48 and losing.

                    White washing that with some “they just hate us” propaganda is bullshit.

                    They are literally murdering Israeli civlians en masse. If it were peaceful hate there would be no war.

                    So you have a choice. It’s either a war crime …

                    Still waiting on citations that Israel’s military courts count as a war crime.

                    or Apartheid.

                    Such definitions pervert the meaning of Apartheid, and depend on treating a belligerent national group like an ethnic group. This is nothing like South Africa; Arabs are 20% of Israeli citizens and are not subject to the same restrictions as the hostile Arab nations trying to kill them.
                    You might be interested in this video regarding how the UN declaring Israel an Apartheid state went down.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      That’s just code for supporting genocide and totalitarianism. The only way to stop a terrorist movement is in fact to engage with it and deal with their grievances in good faith. You only fight them where it is necessary because every fight makes more recruits for their cause.

      • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        Too bad the grievances of these specific terrorists is that if you don’t become muslim they’ll kill you.

        This isn’t some fucking oppressed minority group just trying to be a good lil’ bean and live their lives. They’re radicals that want to genocide people and convert the world to islam by force and threat of death of you don’t.

        Do you think you should engage with domestic right wing US terrorism? To ask the christo-fascists why they are doing what they’re doing and to please stop it? No, they’re insidious because they will die believing they’re 100% in the right and that you trying to prevent them from a full takeover is being “intolerant.”

        Fucking insane you people sit here defending the middle east’s version of conservative Christian nationalism. Fuck all religious nutter butters, they’re the crabs in a bucket trying to revert us to the middle ages so they can have their way with society.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s funny. They sure seem to leave the Christians in Gaza alone for having forcible conversion as a policy.

          Oh right, I forgot. You’re full of shit. These guys aren’t Al Qaida. In fact they’ve consistently shut down any attempt at AQ coming into Gaza.

          They aren’t even saying they want Israel to be a Muslim sharia government. They just want Israel to leave Palestine alone.

    • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Both sides got things they wanted. Seems like a successful negotiation to me.