• Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Saying “both sides bad” has implied meaning. I’m only expanding on the words you said without changing anything. If you said, “The Earth orbits the Sun.” and I expanded that to explain Kepler’s laws, I’m not contradicting you or putting words in your mouth.

        If you want to suggest details such as an example where Trump did good and Biden did bad on a particular policy, then please elaborate. Trump said Ukraine needs to surrender. Biden didn’t say Ukraine should surrender so they are both equally bad? Give me an example.

        • Malfeasant@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Both bad is not the same as both the same. They’re differently bad. That’s the part you seem to be missing.

        • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m not contradicting you or putting words in your mouth.

          you are putting words in my mouth and by claiming you’re not, you are contradicting me.

        • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          they are both equally bad?

          i never said that. i said both are bad. i didn’t compare them. i grouped them.

          • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Ground together doesn’t change your meaning:

            Trump said Ukraine should surrender. Biden said Ukraine shouldn’t surrender and the Republican controlled House of Representatives should help Ukraine. You group both as bad.