• alcyoneous@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Intent doesn’t need to be explicit, but in this case it is.

    https://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/harsh-israeli-rhetoric-palestinians-central-south-africas-genocide-106471144

    In particular:

    “Deputy Knesset speaker Nissim Vaturi from the ruling Likud party wrote on X, formerly known as Twitter, that Israelis had one common goal, “erasing the Gaza Strip from the face of the earth.” Israeli Heritage Minister Amichay Eliyahu, from the far-right Jewish Power party, suggested that Israel drop a nuclear bomb on Gaza and said there were “no uninvolved civilians” in the territory.”

    Also the list of genocidal acts, as per the UN Genocide Convention, stipulates that any one of those acts is genocide, not that all 5 must be done. Acts 1 to 3 are very clearly being used in Gaza, and with Knesset members establishing intent it’s clearly a genocide, but arguably even without those statements the actions Israel has undertaken still fit the definition.

    • speaker_hat@lemmy.oneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      11 months ago

      Thanks for the detailed reply. I agree that the fact that the Israeli government is currently far-right is a problem, and it’s no making the war situation easier.

      Both politicians you quoted, Nissim Vaturi and Eliyahu, are far-right in their vision and views, as a result they say such an extreme sayings.

      However, they don’t have any military influence and cannot have because of their position.

      The ones who do have military power, didn’t show intentions to do so.