• nudny ekscentryk@szmer.info
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    11 months ago

    Anything to a Wikipedia article on the incident it was the armorer that had previous experience with accidental discharges of firearms and I guess it’s the mere point of their presence during filming to make sure all guns are handled safely. Their job was to hand a safe gun to the actor, they didn’t do it and a person died. I don’t fucking see one reason to charge the actor, regardless of whether they happen to be a producer or not, and not charge the person actually responsible for the accident.

    • Maeve@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      He was the armorer’s boss, and the producer, so it was his job to make sure everything was as required. He failed his responsibilities, someone died. It’s pretty simple.

      • RandomStickman@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        It’s maddening the amount of people deflecting responsibility off of him. If a workplace safety incident happened, and the boss has cultivated the lax culture against safety AND is involved with said incident, but he’s not responsible? I feel like I’m taking crazy pills.

        • nudny ekscentryk@szmer.info
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Perhaps because Baldwin, as far as we know, did everything correctly? He had the armorer prepare the gun and assistant producer check it. The armorer failed to do it correctly and the assistant producer failed at their part of the job. They are guilty of the accident, because they did not follow the procedure required, not the person who gave them the task

          • RandomStickman@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            11 months ago

            No one is absolving responsibility from the armourer.

            But if I’m the boss of a warehouse, never enforce any OSHA safety standards against my staff, and one of them just signed off that they inspected the forklift that day without actually doing so, and I drove the forklift and killed someone because of the forklift’s malfunction, I am, as the boss, partly responsible for the incident.

            To say otherwise is flying against rules and regulations written in blood, as we can clearly see.

              • RandomStickman@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                Baldwin is one of the producer (boss), who did not enforce any safety standards (allowed crews to bring live ammo to the set, allowed armourer to be subpar), and ended up with one of his staff dead.

                If you don’t know how my analogy applies to the situation you clearly don’t know enough about it to form an informed opinion.

                ALL workplace safety standards should be the responsibility of the boss in some capacity. That’s how safety standards are maintained. If the boss is allowed to shrug it off saying “it’s not my fault the staff is an idiot” that’s how we end up with new hires dying on the line. If you can’t understand that I could only hope you aren’t in charge of anyone’s safety.

                • nudny ekscentryk@szmer.info
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  who did not enforce any safety standards (allowed crews to bring live ammo to the set, allowed armourer to be subpar), and ended up with one of his staff dead.

                  And you’re basing these two claims on?

        • Maeve@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          Tbh, my first reaction was that it wasn’t fair; then I read more details as they were reported and had a moment of clarity. People get comfortable and mess up, it happens. This time, it cost someone their life.

          For those worried about Alec, he has plenty of money. His ego and wallet will take a hit, but he’s not going to prison. He may or not be in a mental prison, but he can afford quality therapy, so if he is and chooses to stay there, that’s on him.

          • RandomStickman@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            I went on exactly the same path as you and I only read about it when I came across the articles casually browsing, I didn’t actively seek them out.

            There are people that knew more and are still defending him, which is wild.

            • Maeve@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              I hear you. He can still be a decent person who made a serious mistake due to gross negligence. I’m not saying he is or isn’t decent; I like s lot of past things he said, and I hope this was a wake up call for all of us: If we’re coasting too long on good reputation/intention/feelings, we’re going to get hard reminders to actually continue working to be better than we were, yesterday.

              • edited