• disablist@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Good is relative. What you mean is that there isn’t a perfect solution. Don’t let the perfect be the enemy of the good.

      So if your argument is that a two state solution isn’t perfect, therefore we shouldn’t do it, then that’s tacit approval for my first solution…a final solution if you will. Just pick a side, and poof.

      If you’re not comfortable with genocide, then a two state solution is the only viable path forward with any hope of chance of being made into a good outcome, even if not a perfect one.

      So pick one: a final solution or a two-state solution, but stop with the wishy-washy “the status quo must remain until a perfect solution is found”.

      • Rolder@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        Don’t get me wrong I’d love a two state solution or really any solution where they stop killing each other. But in order for a two state solution to happen, you need both sides to agree on the borders, and good luck with that.

        • NegativeInf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Just remind the Israeli government who holds the biggest stick and which hand feeds them.

          • Rolder@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            Reminder that the UN has tried to implement the two state solution before but the Arab side said “No we want all of it”