• QueenB@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    The confusion comes from Genesis giving two creation accounts of a woman.

    Genesis 1:27 So God created mankind in his own image,in the image of God he created them; male and female he created them.

    then later…

    Genesis 2:22 Then the LORD God made a woman from the rib he had taken out of the man, and he brought her to the man.

    It appears that a man and a woman were created at the same time in Genesis 1:27, then later in Genesis 2:22 a woman was created from a rib

    • daddyjones@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      This is probably a result of the Hebrew literary practice of narrating a story once in poetic language and then again in prose. So it’s the same man and woman being created, just retold in a different style.

      • QuarterSwede@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        This is correct. Context is everything in understanding any historical source. The Hebrew texts are no different, in fact they’re a great case study in this field. They’re littered with complex poems.

      • agent_flounder@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        My understanding is that these were two separate stories that were compiled into official state religious texts at the time of King Josiah to unify the country under one monotheistic religion.

    • ImWaitingForRetcons@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      10 months ago

      Current scholarly consensus is that the Geneses are actually two different accounts, one likely originating in ancient Israel and the other in ancient Judah. It’s why the two stories are so startlingly different when you read them side by side.