that analogy doesn’t work. your first statement was “is” your second was “should”. this is an interesting example of an is/ought confusion.

if one had said “the president does not commit crimes! never met him btw” the response would be a lot more reasonable, wouldn’t it?

of course anyone xan make ought statements about anything. you didnt. you said it wasnt fun as if it were a fact. disclaiming your ignorance is fine but not really an excuse. but hey, I dont know anything about you, yet I think you’re a turd swallowing ninny monger!!