• Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    No, of course it’s not fair. That’s exactly why I tip. Because it’s not fair for them and they need help.

    I can’t change that for them. They probably can’t even change it.

    That’s just not how America works unfortunately. America is totally beholden to corporate interests.

    Also, saying “they do it in other countries” as if that means it’s possible in the U.S. when other countries have totally different laws is silly. Australia was able to get rid of guns because they don’t have guns enshrined in their founding document.

    • SkippingRelax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Wrong Australia was able to get rid of guns because everyone was shocked about what happened with a mass shooting, had the right to bear firearms been enshrined in the constitution there would have been a discussion about making a change to it, hasn’t the American constitution ever been amended? Any more reasons why changes can’t happen there? You guys fucking overcame slavery and black people managed to get equal rights (I am sure a few naysayers in the sixties were sceptical about that). Give yourselves more credit

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yes. The American Constitution has been Amended. It takes a 2/3 majority of congress and ratification by three-fourths of the states.

        Which is why amendments are almost never passed.

        Again, you really don’t understand how laws work here.

        The 27th Amendment, the most recent one to be passed, was about congressional salaries. It had been proposed in 1791. It passed in 1992.

        And you think we could realistically get guns out of the U.S. Constitution?

        • SkippingRelax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          You are right, maybe it’s impossible to solve any problems, we should stop bothering. If only someone had told Rosa back then she probably wouldn’t have wasted her time for nothing :)

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 months ago

            When did I say it was impossible? It’s happened 27 times. I said it’s not something realistic, at least not at the moment.

            Also, what does Rosa Parks have to do with amending the constitution? She wasn’t in the U.S. government and there were no constitutional amendments based on her heroism. If you’re going to reference U.S. history, it’s best not to do it wrongly.

            • SkippingRelax@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              Mentioned her before in this thread,before we went down another rabbit hole of impossible / not realistic to change tour constitution. Wasn’t my intention to discuss constitution amendments, we ended up there after I pointed out that discussions about tipping (and universal healthcare, gun control etc etc) always end up in someone bringing up some reasons why bUT that workeD everywhere eLSe oN thE PlaNet but It Can’t worK Here becAuse blah blah.

              I mentioned her not in relation to constitution amendments nor gun control (nor tipping, which ia where we started) just because she didn’t make up excuses about, too hard, unrealistic all the other blah blah I keep hearing here about all the issues the US have

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                10 months ago

                If you didn’t want to discuss constitutional amendments, you shouldn’t have brought up something that would require such a herculean effort to make happen that it is not realistic for the foreseeable future and likely wouldn’t even get ratified for decades even if somehow you could get that many Republicans and Democrats on board as your example.

                Even Bernie Sanders is against a gun ban. He wants more gun control, but he’s not interested in banning guns. Sorry.

                • SkippingRelax@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  Don’t be sorry, its all good I’ll go to sleep knowing that it’s pretty unlikely I’ll get shot when out shopping, and if it happens my hospital fees are free. And while away from work, my employer keeps paying my wages because I’m on sick leave, which doesn’t impact my holidays balance because PTO and sick leave are separate.

                  Unfortunately what worked everywhere else in the Western world for a vast amount of issues clearly can’t work in the US because reasons. OK.

                  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    Sorry… did you think I was defending America? Because I think it’s pretty clear I wasn’t.

                    Most of the rest of the Western world is not an oligarchy designed to maximize profits for a tiny handful of people. That is the “because reasons.” This is like asking why North Koreans haven’t risen up and deposed the Kim family yet. The real world doesn’t work that way.