It’s always neat reading an article where I can pinpoint the exact moment it goes over my head. In this instance, everything before “torsion” makes perfect sense, and everything afterward is witchcraft and I will be testifying against Cox and Zucker at the trial
Source. For research purpose.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cox–Zucker_machine
Crap I’ll never be able to slide that into a casual conversation.
That would be a highly specific casual conversation!
Not with that attitude!
Well you could just lie when someone asks what you do for work and say:
“I’m a mathematician actually. I spend the vast majority of my time working with the Cox-Zucker machine.”
“You would know”
“Hell yeah I would”
“What”
“What”
Intersection of elliptic surfaces… giggity.
It’s always neat reading an article where I can pinpoint the exact moment it goes over my head. In this instance, everything before “torsion” makes perfect sense, and everything afterward is witchcraft and I will be testifying against Cox and Zucker at the trial
See also