• KevonLooney@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Most people were not very accepting of “different” people back then, but maybe it was just not talked about. There were a ton of “confirmed bachelors” and plenty of women had “roommates”.

      People in the North and South were not different. The North had a ton of racists who didn’t want to fight and die for “colored people”. There was a huge riot in NYC of people who didn’t want to be drafted. They killed black people they found for no reason.

      • Donebrach@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        I think the Union’s stake in the civil war was more about federal supremacy over the United States (which obviously goes without question in a federal system). Ending slavery was just a function of that goal. I say this as someone who grew up in the southwest and is wholly committed to the authority of the federal government over individual states because that is obviously the system outlined in the constitution.

        Of course “The North” was just as racist and still is just as shitty and racist as every other part of this country.

        P.S. “The South” can suck it as a name, I propose a better title for former confederate states: The Losers (since it seems a certain demographic therein needs reminding).

        • psud@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Sure, the North wanted consolidation. Of course the only reason the south seceded was because the federation said no more slaves

          Many of the people in the North were as racist as the South, but the government was less so