• imPastaSyndrome@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      >not rage bait

      >likely that someone that works at Google could see this

      > and fix the issue.

      Your statements are funny.

      It’s literally on “mildly infuriating”

      It’s not likely that a Google programmer who works on search results would see it

      And further then make changes to whatever response database and further have access and the go-ahead to do so

        • imPastaSyndrome@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          “you have to have a better idea then mine in order to show that me saying something is not ragebait and is LIKELY is wrong”

          No

      • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Aren’t they likely to see brand mentions?

        Same principle:

        Would be irresponsible not to be tracking keywords ‘round the web… imagine if this discussion were “new Google Search CSAM exploit”! But I do expect some level of engagement really helps the odds of discussions being raised to a company’s attention, so you’re right it’s not a guarantee.

    • Alexstarfire@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      That a random worker at Google would not only see this, but also make changes based on it. That kind of stuff only happens with indie devs and open source projects. Plenty of companies take things like this into consideration but workers aren’t going solo.