• bulwark@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Part of the issue for me was the audio is mixed so that you can barely hear the dialogue.

      • Ibaudia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        I heard it was mixed specifically for high-end theatre speakers. I think Nolan was just too far up his own ass on this one.

        • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          I watched it in Dolby Atmos and still couldn’t understand shit. It was simply very, very badly mixed. I don’t think I’ll watch another film from Nolan.

      • TheControlled@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Optimized for peak surround sound, allegedly. I have a $5000 system and it still sounds like shit. I can understand it, but it’s shit nonetheless.

        Snobby ≠ good, methinks.

    • BluesF@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      It’s frankly amazing that it managed to make it to release. Who the fuck thought the mix was acceptable? Scene 1 I had no clue what was happening because I couldn’t hear! Ridiculous.

      • synae[he/him]@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Who the fuck thought the mix was acceptable?

        That would be Christopher Nolan, who I believe is trolling people with his sound design choices at this point

    • books@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      I watched in on a plane and didn’t have the audio issue I’ve heard everyone talk about.

      I did however have the issue of not understanding the flick.

    • Tyrangle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      I kept hearing this complaint but when I finally watched it there was only one scene where I couldn’t hear the dialogue (when Neil is scoping out the airport bank vault) and it seemed very much intentional. Did you find this to be an issue throughout the entire film?

      • leave_it_blank@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        Same. The moment you don’t understand the dialogue then it’s not important, that moment it’s about atmosphere. Worked great for me. I enjoyed the sound mixing in this movie!

      • excitingburp@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        Just like modern plots, modern audio editing spoonfeeds the audience: https://youtu.be/XOXJLwzIOoA?si=XY-0mUmwx9_V51Tl. We need to be told each and every detail about the security system in order to understand that it’s extreme, even though those details wouldn’t add to the plot in any way (as I recall, the last thing you can hear is the risk of suffocation - which is the last aspect of the security system that was relevant later on).

        Next thing you know, audiences will start complaining that depth of field/camera blur is obscuring in unimportant details in the background.

    • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Ugh, I hate that so much! Especially since I sometimes like to fall asleep to a movie I’ve seen many times before and at the end just drift off to the sound of it.

      “Whisper whisper whisper EXPLOSIONS AND YELLING whisper whisper whisper” is probably my least favorite style of sound mixing.

      I like to be able to hear the quiet parts without the loud parts bursting my ear drums, thank you very much!

      • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        You may want to see if your TV has a “night mode” in the audio settings. It’s basically just an audio compander, (combination of compressor and expander.) It expands the quiet parts to be louder, and compresses the loud parts to be quieter. It destroys any kind of dynamics that the director intended, and can cause some difficulty with intelligibility if there’s lots of background noise, (because the noise is getting expanded too!) But for watching things at night, it’s almost a must for dynamic movies.

        Some brands call it headphone mode, because headphone users also frequently complain about dynamic audio too; They turn up to hear the quiet parts, then get their ears blown off during the loud parts.

        • Plopp@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          You’re talking about a regular compressor with make up gain. An expander makes the quiet parts even quieter. Compressors compress the dynamic range (which is what you’d want in this scenario), expanders expands the dynamic range.

      • herrvogel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Normally that’s due to poor mixing work. I’m tenet’s case it was a deliberate choice by Nolan.