• Paragone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    Perfect example of Newspeak gaslighting.

    “negative growth” instead of diminuition, population-recession, reduced population, or ANY proper rendition of the concept.

    Nobody in mainstream media speaks plainly anymore, because … money requires befuddlement instead of clear-understanding?

    Or is there some/any other explanation??

    • Canadian_anarchist@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      Apparently the proper term, 'natural decrease ', is much less sensational. It’s all about clicks and views now, not delivering good content.

      • Quokka@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        Is it natural if it’s bought on by low wages and high prices making it impossible for most to afford a family?

        • 31337@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          Those in poverty usually have more children. Woman having more rights and joining the workforce is probably a major cause; which is probably why there’s all this money backing taking away women’s rights recently. Another major cause is likely isolation and lack of community in modern life (“it takes a village…”).

    • somethingchameleon@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      The proper term is decay.

      Growth and decay. We learn this in elementary school.

      (As time goes on, I realize I received a much better education than the vast majority of people on the planet.)