• JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    The scales have their places.

    F is range of comfortable heat for humans. 0 oppressively cold, 100 is oppressively hot. Nearly all humans can agree on that.

    C is range of comfortable heat for liquid water at 1ATM.

    K is range of comfortable heat for an atom. Except atoms can handle lots of heat.

    Wait is there a universal maximum temperature? There must be, right? Like, it has to be impossible for atoms and subatomic particles to move faster than the speed of light, right?

    • TheSealStartedIt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      I always have to comment when I read s.th. like this. And I read it a lot when it comes to temperature scales. Celsius is completely fine scale for humans, most of the world uses it without any complaints. A human cannot tell 22° and 23° C apart. Even americans using Fahrenheit say something like “temperature is in the fifties”. Fahrenheit (like lots of other scales in the US) has no real place in this world anymore except in this special american view of things…

    • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Nah, Fahrenheit doesn’t have a place. Humans feel temperature differently to one another. You can’t make a set scale about it.

      Humans have been known to live and thrive in temperatures well below 0°, as well as above 100°. And while 50° is the middle, it isn’t even a comfortable temperature for humans.

      0° is based on what that one Polish town measured in winter during that one year 1709, only later did they find something to represent that temperature.

      The world doesn’t need Fahrenheit. Humans don’t need it either.

      • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        Having this:

        Humans feel temperature differently to one another. You can’t make a set scale about it.

        And this:

        The world doesn’t need Fahrenheit. Humans don’t need it either.

        In the same comment is wild. Which is it, people all feel temperature differently so it’s impossible to make everyone agree on a scale, or Celsius is the one scale that everyone must agree on?

    • BluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      The theoretical maximum possible temperature is about 142 nonillion Kelvin (1.42x10^32 K), which is known as Planck Temperature. Current models of physics break down beyond this point, and it would only be possible at a state of thermal equilibrium. So possibly at the first instant after the Big Bang, and never again

    • original2@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      thats very arbitrary. Normal temperature is between 0 and 30 C, and 15 C is comfortble for most people