• Forester@yiffit.netOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    I’m not saying Germany can’t produce solar energy. Currently 5% of all the energy Germany uses is solar. I’m saying Germany can’t run on nothing but solar energy which is why we need something dependable to take up the base load. That is not fossil fuel based.

    • If you Google “is a nuclear baseload required” you’ll find plenty of articles clearly demonstrating why this isn’t true. Renewables + storage solutions can provide the base load just fine. The biggest issues have been worked out already, it just needs to be built (which is expensive, but so would nuclear be).

      • Forester@yiffit.netOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        8 months ago

        Please tell me your plans for renewable storage to meet 84% of our power needs in the next 5 years

          • Forester@yiffit.netOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            That depends entirely on what design you go with. Ideally we would be looking at municipal level power generation with modern proven light water Small modular reactor designs reliant on passive safety features we can pump them out of factories at a rate of approximately two per day if we can look at the average aerospace industry rate of construction for jumbojets for a comparable engineering project in size and scope to most SM reactors.

            There are also many options to convert existing fossil-fired plants to be nuclear powered at the end of the day a turbine spinning is a turbine spinning. It doesn’t care whether you boiled the water with radiation or coal or oil or gas

      • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        Yeah, OP keeps using the lack of current investment in renewables as an argument that it can’t be done at scale. It’s a really weird lack of logic whether they’re aware of it and arguing in bad faith or just fundamentally confused…

        • woelkchen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          OP calling you a “dipshit” and others “fucking shills” is clear evidence OP knows he/she is losing the argument and gets emotional about it.

          What’s funny is that nuclear apologists sweep other renewables like geothermal under the rug and only proclaim that wind and solar depend on the elements. Wind and solar do but others like geothermal don’t. Hydropower is also less dependent on flukes of nature.

          Also France needs to lower their nuclear energy output in summer because the cooling water from rivers gets too hot.