• terminhell@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    To this day, I still don’t understand what takes windows updates so dam long. Not sure about Mac, but Linux takes, what, 5 minutes at most if you’ve gone a while.

    • sebsch@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      They have no packages but do a full patch of the system data. Since this is the most complex approach and almost everything can go wrong down to the core they spend most of the time with checking and cleaning state.

    • Espi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is a byproduct of one of the largest and more ignored differences between windows and linux. The fact that Linux let’s you modify files while they are open whereas windows doesn’t.

      This means that you can update a linux system by just replacing the files with the new ones while it runs. On the other side, Windows can’t modify its own files while it runs, so instead it has a second entire OS to update itself, and requires a reboot to unload all the files and boot from the updater without locking windows files.

      • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        In some sense this would even seem an advantage of Windows. (I know it’s the fundamental reason for many hangs and freezes, but the idea that a file is a lockable resource doesn’t seem that bad.)

    • brb@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Can’t remember a windows update taking longer than 5 minutes. And even if it did take that long, you can just press “update and shutdown” when you stop using the pc. Windows has a lot of problems but this isn’t one of them.

      • ShouldIHaveFun@feddit.ch
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        If your computer is always running it may never take longer than five minutes. But try to leave your computer shut down for a month or more. Then updates accumulate and it can take really long to make them.

      • Catsrules@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        A lot of it happens in the backgound. It is at least a 15-30 minute process from start to finish. Very annoying if you have an older computer as it is sucks up a lot of resources updating during the background updates.

        I normally don’t ever shutdown or restart my desktop. I like leaving program and stuff running so I can continue what I am doing when I get back. With an update I have to close out all of my shit and then shutdown and open everything back up.

        I also swear when you have updates pending on a restart the computer doesn’t run very well.

        • brb@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I see now. I have pretty beefy computer so I haven’t noticed that. I also shutdown my computer every night so it’s still not problem for me.

          • terminhell@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Another issue is that windows will eventually force a reboot on you with pending updates. You can postpone it for a while, but eventually you’ll be in the middle of something and it will just do it anyways.

            • pirat@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              This is, in some regards, similar to rape…

              Edit: to clarify,

              Another issue is that windows a predatory person will eventually force a reboot on rape you with pending updates upknocking. You can sometimes postpone it for a while, but eventually you’ll be in the middle of something and it they will just do it anyways.

              Hopefully, we’ll agree that rape is much worse, but the underlying principle is the same: some entity abuses something you own - your body/property. Since you’re the owner, you exclusively should be in control.

              Unfortunately, it can sometimes be necessary to leave an abusive partner/OS. This can be challenging if you “need” one but they’re all evil and dominating. M$ is not abusing its users as violently as some people are abusing their partners. However, their subtle abuse of their users takes place on a much bigger scale. Not only in this (pretty unimportant) regard, but also by e.g. unwanted telemetry/tracking. Luckily, non-abusive partners of the Linux family are becoming easier to find and date, and many are already flirting with one or more of them.

    • herrvogel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Mac updates are less frequent but take longer. They also restart the machine. One difference though is that my mac never took it upon itself to start an update without asking my opinion.

      • macniel@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        /laughs in company enforced updates/

        First they nag you. Then they nag even more. Then they blur out everything making your system unusable unless you hit update.

    • whofearsthenight@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      WSL exists on a Windows system which means you’re still subject to Microsoft’s rather insane update practices.

      • 0x2d@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        linux: sudo pacman -Syyu/sudo apt update/whatever your distro uses

        windows: updates whenever the hell it feels like

        • whofearsthenight@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          See also ->

          Linux: you need to update some core system component? Don’t worry, we’ll keep right on running until you decide to reboot.

          Windows: notepad.exe has an update, we’re rebooting in .3s I hope you can save fuckin quick bro

          • absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Linux: hey dude, you should probably restart…I mean it’s been months.

            Windows: so imma just gonna nuke your work, ok cool.

  • CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    1 year ago

    My director got knocked off in the middle of a call where we were trying to establish requirements with a specialist due to a Windows update. I would have laughed if these guys weren’t worth so much.

    • MaxHardwood@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Should have laughed if this was a corporate device. They ignored the continuous popups for too long and was forced into compliance at an inconvenient time because they couldn’t be bothered to reboot at the end of the day for likely 2 weeks.

      • CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Our corporate devices are set to update and reboot automatically. This is set to happen in the evenings and usually works, but sometimes does not. I leave my device online and powered on 24/7 and still get caught by midday updates that were scheduled for 2am.

  • AdamBomb@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Lately WSL has become unresponsive and unkillable every time I wake my work laptop from sleep, so now I have to shut it down every day instead. Sucks.

    • intrepid@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Back when Microsoft started showing interest in and contributing to Linux, I knew that they were up to something no good like this. But honestly, anyone who thinks that WSL running inside a very abusive Windows environment is an alternative to true Linux/BSD experience, is frankly clueless. They deserve everything MS subjects them to.

      • InputZero@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I tried WSL for a week to give it a fair shake. It sucked just horrible all around. The worst part is that it left behind reginfo and other crap I’m too afraid of trying to remove from fear of borking my windows install. Yeah I can reinstall it but I’m lazy.

  • PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 year ago

    WSL allowed my stupid Windows desktop to run Pihole. Very cool? Meh.

    Not as cool as running Pihole on an old android phone. Somehow that’s much more stable.

      • Rodeo@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think the word you’re looking for is “foundation” lol

        fundament
        noun

        1. The buttocks.
        2. The anus.
        3. The natural features of a land surface unaltered by humans.

        In practice the word is almost always used in the adjective form “fundamental”, which actually refers more to a foundation than a fundament.

      • MonkderZweite@feddit.ch
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ok, Powertoys were made by MS employees in their free time. It’s the company culture that makes things suck.

      • PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Meh, Microsoft has put out some shitty fucking software but Windows XP, 7, and 10 were tight.

        The only time any of these OS’s fell apart was when I downloaded viruses from sketchy sites.

        • bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          For the record, hot single milfs in your area are typically not found by “clicking here.”

        • The security on XP was comically bad. When people say “physical access is full access,” they aren’t even considering XP despite it being the textbook definition to the phrase. You were able to access the command line without even logging in.

        • Free Palestine 🇵🇸@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I will never understand why people liked Windows XP, I’d rather use Gentoo Linux from 2002 compiled from a stage 1 tarball than this steaming pile of shit. Windows 7 was solid, but 10 was (again) the biggest piece of garbage. Horrible UWP UI, Cortana, the garbage Windows Store, the Windows Phone integration, the useless Xbox app, the shitty version of OneNote, crappy MS Edge, Candy Crush ads in the fucking start menu and tons of data collection. Oh yeah, what a great operating system!

        • stjobe@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          BizTalk was (is?) a solid and also quite impressive product. That said, I’m happy I haven’t had to work with it for years 🙂

      • 30p87@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        One would think this only involves their operating spyware system, but all of their “professional” software is just as bad too!

  • doctorcrimson@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Honestly incredible that this issue has persisted in OEM versions for decades but seems to be progressively getting worse instead of better, now affecting even LTSC copies (for people too stupid to remember to turn automatic updates off). Windows, if you take hours to update a machine twice a week then you’re making important equipment inoperable during that time. Please fix that, or you will lose market share even faster than you inevitably will.

    • Holzkohlen@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Last week an update broke my moms mandatory TPM nonsense module thingy. Like bro, this is a laptop that ships with win11 preinstalled and an update breaks your preconfigured system? I can’t even comprehend. Like how the heck are casual users supposed to deal with that?

  • doomkernel@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    87
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I still believe the name should be Linux Subsystem for Windows. The other way around sound like Proton

    • phorq@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      That would require Microsoft admitting they come in second.

    • maeries@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      It actually makes sense. It’s a subsystem in Windows (therefore a windows subsystem) that makes Linux work

          • seitanic@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            I like vim, but I’m not a power user, so trying to code with it sounds…painful. I’ve never cracked emacs, although it has piqued my curiosity.

          • Nahdahar@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Learning vim motions in VSCode with the vim plugin was the best decision I made this year. Made programming even more fun and after a year of learning I actually feel that I finally reached a point where I’m a lot more productive. I set up neovim too, but I’m missing some things to fully switch from VSCode and I have to research my options (git integration and debugging are my pet peeves), which I haven’t had time for lately.

    • MostlyHarmless@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      It is a subsystem of Windows that Linux runs in. It’s not a subsystem of Linux.

      Windows is the system. It’s the host operating system. It created a subsystem specifically for running a child operating system. In this case, Linux

    • intrepid@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      In what world would Microsoft allow the Linux name to appear before Windows? If MS were a person, they would be diagnosed with Narcissistic Personality Disorder.

    • thestereobus@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s also usually lawyers that create these names. I worked on databases for IBM Cloud and they were all called “IBM Cloud Databases for Elasticsearch” and what have you. Despite it being an offering of the database on IBM’s cloud.

      Since Elasticsearch is a brand name, the “host” corporation corporation has to present it as a product “for” the brand name rather than as the brand name itself to avoid implying that they are acting AS Linux or Elasticsearch or whoever is the third party.

  • AzureDiamond@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I once tried wsl on my work machine instead of having to deal with cygwin or msys2. Unfortunately the virus scanner didn’t like that a whole lot and my account was locked. Man do I love enterprise problems on top of normal problems.

    • bleistift2@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      1 year ago

      That must have been an incredibly shitty virus scanner if it complains about Windows features.

      • 520@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Enterprise security software tends to err much more on the side of caution.

        There are plenty of Windows features who’s usage will flag because they are also favourite tactics by actual threats, such as Powershell one liners. Bonus if it’s in Base64.

    • AggressivelyPassive@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      The VPN client I’m using doesn’t play properly with wsl, so I can often randomly not use internal services, because there’s no route available. Unfortunately, that includes our k8s cluster, so I have to use a different kubectl outside of wsl to work with it. Awesome.

        • AggressivelyPassive@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Sure, they could. But they won’t. Simply because those who could enact the changes are working from the offices, and those don’t have these problems.

  • TheKingBee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’m not trying to defend windows, it has a myriad of issues, but I’ve never understood the meme of it updating at inconvenient times. I run windows 11 pro, I set it to only update when i tell it to and it does… Like it’s never been a problem, wasn’t a problem in windows 10 or 7 pro either.

    I don’t get it, am i windows whisperer and not know it?

    • WetBeardHairs@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      As a software developer, I still struggle with windows fuckery. I have to manage about a dozen machines, each of which has different tasks, and sometimes they decide to just up and reboot for the mandatory update. While I am out of state.

      Uhg. I spent time yesterday writing a windows service to perpetually send a WoL magic packet to those computers just to avoid this situation again. They may never shut off again.

    • Misconduct@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I mean… There’s videos of it suddenly doing an update in the middle of people’s gaming/work sessions lol. I used to stream way back when windows updates were at their troll peak and had one kick off in the middle of a stream. It just happened randomly to some of us regardless of what was scheduled. I don’t imagine it happened more than once for too many people. Generally speaking it’s pretty good about sneaking updates in even though I detest how aggressive it is about them

    • toddestan@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      There’s always the centrally managed corporate Windows desktops. My workplace is better about this now, but previously they’d just push down updates and with some of them you’d have little other choice but to let it proceed no matter how inconvenient the timing.