• ben@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ll have you know that the fake internet points are still here and I will continue to use them to determine my worth in the eyes of my peers.

  • Underwaterbob@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah, and it’s people arguing about cars, Trump, rich people, work, Linux distros, not pooping, and communism.

    • letsgocrazy@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s the main thing I hate about Lemmyverse is that the zealots and puritans came over too.

      They always think you mean someone else when you say “please stop constantly trying to shoehorn your politics into everything”

      • WiseThat@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        My dude, everything is politics. Especially things like “I want a free internet” or “I don’t want to be drowning in ads” which is a huge part of the appeal of Lemmy are both DEEPLY political stances.

        • letsgocrazy@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I see you can’t understand the difference between zealotry and normal discussion.

          “I don’t want ro drowning in ads” doesn’t have to mean “but trump is Hitler evil Jews did this blah blah everyone who isn’t of my opinion is a murderer”

        • letsgocrazy@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Actually, I’m going to add something to my last reply.

          “not wanting to be drowning in ads” is in no way shape or form a political decision.

          If you mean “because adverts are capitalism” then you’re part of the deeply naive problem.

          It’s perfectly plausible - because it literally has happened - for people to construct a platform under our system (which is also hybrid anywat) that allows for social media to exist without adverts.

          You’re literally the kind of person when I mean when I talk about trying too shoe-horn politics into things when it doesn’t belong.

  • tygerprints@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    91
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve been around since 1959, and back then people were up in arms about the partisan divide in this country and the Vietnam conflict and the oppression of black and other races. Back then, domestic abuse was sort of commonplace, no man could be sent to jail for beating up his kids or his wife. Alcoholism was rampant back then, and drug abuse shot up dramatically. Since then, I’ve seen so much of the same play out over and over. Things have changed somewhat for the better in some ways, but to be honest - there never was a ‘good old time’ when everyone felt happy and equal and safe and protected.

    • Lmaydev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      59
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      In my experience people who talk about the good old days are white and male.

      It was a time when they got their way 100% and everyone else could get fucked.

      • tygerprints@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s about it. I’m white and male and I’m here to tell you, there never was a ‘good old days’ unless you mean a time when white men could get away with raping and killing a young kid like Emmett Till and could butcher their families and get away with it.

      • DreamerofDays@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        1 year ago

        More likely it was when they were kids and without adult responsibilities, or narrow/whitewashed views of the past(as from stories and shows from before their birth)

        • ReplicantBatty@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          I look back at my childhood as the ‘good ole days’ mostly because of the no responsibilities thing. The more I learn about what stuff was really going on in the 90’s/2000s, the more I see there was no good ole days, just times when I was insulated from the harsh realities of the world.

          • tygerprints@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            My childhood in the 60s and 70s was idyllic, I have to admit - growing up on a private reserve with mountains all around and having woods around to play and get lost in. I loved it all - but even then I knew about the conflicts going on and how unhappy most adults seemed.

          • DreamerofDays@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            I hold similar views(obviously), but I find something comforting in it. Like, rather than living in a ruined paradise lost by us or our parents, we live in a complicated world where we share the work of trying to make something better with our ancestors.

            (Of course, we also have to figure out how to do that, and, in a complicated world, that can be challenging and lead to conflict)

    • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      I feel as though there was a “good old days” of the internet. Don’t get me wrong, it was a complete shit show, but it was anonymous, anyone could say anything that they wanted, and there would be few if any consequences. There were ads, but they were generally garbage animated GIFs at worst.

      It wasn’t perfect, but we were free to do what we wanted on the internet, with little to no bearing on our daily lives.

      Now, it’s almost expected that your online activity will be tied to you specifically. In most cases, your legal name is attached to it for everyone to see. If you try to go around without your legal name on everything, then generally you are either severely limited, or outright removed from the platform. Sigh

      • tygerprints@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s true enough. I started working around the time computers were even a thing - back in the 70s and there was no internet, just basic DOS green screens that were very basic. It wasn’t until the mid-90s I even had a computer that had rudimentary internet access - and it was so new, there was only maybe a handful of websites you could find.

        There were no cookies or trackers to watch what you were doing online, but then again, there wasn’t anything much to look at anyway - porn wasn’t even there yet.

        So I feel we definitely have it both better and worse today. To me, the better outweights the negatives - I mean it’s so much nicer today to just be able to search anything and get a million different answers. But that’s also the downfall of everyone being interconnected - being buried in bullshit much of the time.

      • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        and there would be few if any consequences.

        Meted out by human beings who had to read the thread in aggravatingly linear order - so they were more likely to say ‘you were being kind of a butthead’ instead of ‘how dare you call anyone a butthead.’

    • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve been around since the 70s and I mostly agree … but on one point I disagree … the ability of humanity to wipe itself out with a nuclear exchange. Back then, even 20, 30 years ago there were a lot level headed leaders who (although we may have disagreed with them) were less radical and would be less likely to consider launching a nuclear weapon for any reason. Back then, we also had a lot of actual war veterans in the public and in government who understood the nature of war … now there are fewer of them around. Most people including those in government now don’t know what war is any more, other than to see it glorified in history books, movies and pop culture.

      So the combination scares me … a society that is complacent to war yet has the weapons to cause world wide destruction if someone disagrees with them.

      • tygerprints@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        There is only one way that humanity will finally end - and yes, it will be by nuclear war. And it’s not very far off at all. There is no other way that the fate of humanity can go. There is such a lack of human compassion and empathy and such a desire to cause hurt, it’s just a matter of hours. So don’t think it won’t happen. There’s no other possible outcome for us at this point, none whatsoever (unless an asteroid demolishes us first, that is).

  • SuperSpruce@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    This might be a hot take here, but I’d be open to instances running a limited number of ads with minimal tracking to generate enough revenue to keep the instance afloat.

    It’s why I did use the official Reddit app at first when I started using Reddit. They can’t bleed money forever. But when they kept making the app worse and worse and worse that’s when I switched to third party apps. And after they killed those, I didn’t have any sympathy for Reddit because I was sick of their continued greed.

    • pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      If Lemmy ever does have ads, I will tell everyone to avoid the platform like the plague. No ads. Ever. If your instance is too big to run on donations alone, it’s too big to exist and its members need to branch out.

      Future platforms need to be programmed with a max number of users.

    • dauerstaender@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t want any ads. But I’d pay money to a small Verein or something similar to keep a community instance running. Being a profitable customer to a social network works against the best interest to any mental health.

    • Mossy Feathers (She/They)@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Honestly, I’d love it if platforms gave people the option to either pay a subscription and maintain the privacy, or see ads and give up their personal data. However, it looks like we’re going in the, “pay a subscription to watch ads and have data stolen” route.

    • ddkman@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t think ADS were ever the problem. The problem was the ratio. ORIGINALLY adblock plus, when it was a relevant adblocker had an option to allow less obtrusive ads to show. The rules they set for themselves there was pretty reasonable.

      • SuperSpruce@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I used that for a while specifically because of that feature. But I switched to uBlock origin when I found out it could block those autoplaying videos as well.

    • ghost_of_faso2@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      just make the cost to run the server transparent and setup a monthly goal to cover the costs, none of this capitalist shit; with adverts come advertisers botfarms and astro turfing to boot.

    • Makeshift@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      When I became financially independent I got Reddit premium even though I didn’t really use any of the features. Already had adblock and RES. I just wanted to support the site I spent hours on.

      Cancelled that when they killed Apollo.

      But I do agree that limited ads aren’t an issue… except for the slippery slope that’s happened. Just a few more ads… just a little more intrusive…

  • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    I like the absence of cumulative fake internet points. I do think it lends a healthier perspective to the community

  • Limit@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    There is plenty of propaganda on lemmy. You just have to realize you will always be fed propaganda and understand there is propaganda on each side of every issue…

    • Avnar@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I havent seen a universal agreed definition of propaganda. It seems like anything advokating for something that that person doesnt agree with is propaganda.

    • ddkman@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      There is incomparably more propaganda here then anywhere else. On reddit politics are kept out of most subs that are not specifically discussing politics, here everyone uses every opportunity to push whatever agenda they happen to have

  • sexy_peach@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s pretty cool, even though it not even 1% of the size of the big social media monopolists

  • socsa@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Lemmy is just as much an information warfare platform as anything on Reddit. The Israel/Hamas coverage has confirmed that pretty conclusively.

    • InputZero@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Eh, talking about Isreal/Hamas/Palestine has been a sensitive topic for as long as I can remember. I wouldn’t be surprised if an argument broke out between two Catholics in a church on Sunday if they were talking about it. It’s an extremely devicive issue.

  • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    When Lemmy replaces Reddit, I wonder what will replace Lemmy when Lemmy goes corporate.

    • Cowbee@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      How would it go corporate beyond specific instances? That’s kind of the entire point.

    • morrowind@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Lemmy will replace lemmy. It’s federated and open source by design, so if any corpo manages to take over existing instances, people can just create and move to new ones. Lemmy is the endgame. Lemmy is the final software, the last forum.

      /s

      ok, maybe if a better software comes along it might replace it. But it’s still safe in theory from corporate takeovers