• AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Led by new solar power, the world added renewable energy at breakneck speed in 2023, a trend that if amplified, should help Earth turn away from fossil fuels and prevent severe warming and its effects.

    Both state and federal incentives had a large influence on US solar growth, said Daniel Bresette, president of the Environmental and Energy Study Institute, a nonprofit education and policy organization.

    China is on track to surpass its ambitious 2030 target of 1,200 gigawatts of utility-scale solar and wind power capacity five years ahead of schedule if planned projects are all built, the Global Energy Monitor said.

    The cost of key battery raw materials, including lithium, also dropped significantly, Benchmark senior analyst Evan Hartley said.

    “The battery cost is now on that trajectory that most Americans will be able to afford an EV,” said Paul Braun, a University of Illinois professor of materials science and engineering.

    Health and safety violations were found at a joint venture plant between General Motors Co. and LG Energy Solution in Ohio.


    The original article contains 1,262 words, the summary contains 171 words. Saved 86%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

      • Newtra@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        An increasing proportion of renewables doesn’t necessarily mean a decrease in overall carbon output. Our per-person electricity consumption keeps rising. AI, electric cars, crypto, air conditioning to mitigate climate change, etc. all demand more electricity each year as they become more popular.

        Wins don’t come from new growth being sustainable. We need to be actively shutting down the existing unsustainable energy production. It doesn’t matter whether this is done by replacing it with renewables, or by reducing our consumption with e.g. efficiency standards for AI and cars.

    • Hooverx@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      coal capacity is going up, but utilization is going down

      it’s a cool ass trend

  • Newtra@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    China is also still building new coal plants at a truly alarming rate.

    Don’t let heavy carbon emitters steer the narrative this way. Building renewables is just the cheapest way to keep expanding your energy grid at there moment, but if you’re not actively taking power plants offline to reduce carbon emissions, you’re not actually getting greener.

    EDIT: LMAO I’m being mass-downvoted. This is why it’s important to think critically about every headline about China - there is an army of propagandists trying to make sure you only see the good stuff.

    • test113@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Please, you are so right - but please do not engage further with this kind of posts in the future, just report them - the OP of this post is 1 day old, most likely a bot account - Lemmy needs better moderation, and that fast, it’s getting worse and worse, day by day.

    • Dyf_Tfh@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      People really tend to forget that natural gas + variable renewable energies is the current cheapest/more profitable option, but is overall non sustainable.

      Storage + VRE is barely existent because energy provider aren’t incentivised to build it.

      • Newtra@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Arg, my first reply was completely off topic. I thought this was a reply in another post.

        Yeah, it’s great that VRE is cheaper now, but we shouldn’t celebrate companies/countries for just taking the cheapest option. It drowns out the legitimate celebration of the companies/countries that are actually making hard decisions by funding renewables when they aren’t the cheapest option, investing in long-term R&D, taxing carbon, fixing bureaucratically-entrenched perverse incentive structures, etc.

  • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    But the US can’t expand renewable energy because China and India aren’t doing it! People who were DEFINITELY arguing in good faith and not acting as paid or unpaid shills for the fossil fuel industries said so!

    • jimbolauski@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      If I recall correctly it was more about the US giving money to China to build renewable energy while there were no restrictions on how many coal plants China could build.

  • ElderWendigo@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s easy to lead in growth of a sector when that sector has been practically non-existent and you start growing. I can lead in acceleration on a bicycle from a dead start vs. a car already cruising down the highway, but that doesn’t mean much does it?

  • hh93@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Let’s see where the “bUt ChInA1!1!” People move the goalpost next to not have to change