I’ve just blocked the linux communities. I quite liked Linux when I still had reason to use it, but it’s just not something I care to see so frequently when scrolling the FP. Just keep blocking the /c/ you don’t want and eventually you’ll have a curated list of posts you want to see. But maybe i’m just old, ya young bastard. :p

That always happens when a new platform is born.

Tech/nerds are always the ones moving first because they don’t mind the quirks, they’re not scared of bugs or instabilities.

They start building up communities until the platform is ready for the rest of the people, it was the same for reddit, tho it happened so many years ago the new people wouldn’t even know about it.

Someone made a poll about this on mastodon recently.

https://mastodon.art/@jsstaedtler/110668308409683502

I just joined and I suspect that you’re correct: there’s an overall learning curve. No snarky tone intended, but explaining decentralization to those who would likely struggle with grasping the basic client/server model is going to be challenge.

Shoot, I’ve got 10 years pentesting and R&D under my belt and it took me a while to weigh the pros and cons of creating an account on a public instance or self-hosting. (Will self-host eventually…enjoying a test drive.)

• In 10 years
• Check
• Check

Yep, I’m all three…

Well heck, that looks like me. I was thinking about running back to Fidonet.

deleted by creator

I’ve seen and even tried to run a few polls on age (mostly on mastodon and microblogs).

The age demographic of the fediverse definitely leans as you think … on average … Xennial tech/academia/nerd oriented. Not too sure linux users are too dominant though.

As for more diverse users? This isn’t mainstream (yet?). There’s a lot of inertia around the big-social era. It lasted for a long time relative to the history of the internet, ~2008-2022, ~14 years, which is nearly as long as the internet had been around for before then. So many are stuck in their ways and stuck on the idea that there’s only one or two places to be online and they’re on one of them, the “right place”. I saw someone on twitter just yesterday say that they’ll stay on twitter until it goes down and then never go anywhere else because they don’t want to bother with another social media platform.

It seems that the idea of a monopolised internet is breaking apart and fracturing now, which is a good thing, but not completely good across the board. Where for instance should emergency information be broadcast? Previously I would have checked twitter before mastodon without blinking. Now, Lemmy might actually be pretty good for this (only realising this now as I write). So there’s also a dimension of kinda believing in the big/monopolised social media. This is likely more prevalent amongst younger people, from whom, for example, I’ve heard ideas like that decentralisation is some weird tech-libertarian ideology and that the “town square” is actually a good thing and something that should be committed to. As far as anyone that has any commercial interest in their social media profile like businesses (both small and big!) or journalists, not being the town square, and the lack of apparent “engagement” and “virality” on the fediverse is definitely a turn off. And of course having those types on a platform naturally attracts others. All of which is not to mention that the decentralisation thing is something your average person just doesn’t have the time or patience for and the insistence of some of the people on the fediverse that you should learn about it and that it isn’t hard are off-putting to some.

In the end, we’ve reached a bit of an impasse it seems, where we’ve culturally outgrown the idea of an important service like our online existence being at the mercy of private corporate whims, but don’t have a clear way out. Accepting that the internet is diverse and not monopolised may just take some time.

Where the fediverse comes in is that it gives you both a fractured and diverse social media space but also the ability to connect anything to anything with a standardised protocol. It’s a powerful idea, just like that of the internet itself, and whether it’s activity pub or some other standardised protocol, I hope it makes it.

FWIW, someone on my Mastodon TL suspected the same thing and made a poll regarding the users age. About 850 people voted and 63% turned out to be 30-50 years old.

Here’s the toot in question. In Spanish tho https://mastodon.social/@batmanyyo/110668830560740847

I don’t know what you’re talking about, I’m just your average Hollywood celebrity here to promote my new movie “Barbie”, only in theaters July 21st.

To answer your question, for the non-tech-savvy having to pick a server is, yes, too much of a leap. We are conditioned in the industrialized capitalist world against making decisions we don’t understand.

If we want to market it, we could make a wizard that randomly designates a server from a set of cooperating servers. Include also reminders that a user can join multiple servers and each one has separate rules (say, regarding posting NSFW material even to appropriate communities.)

I just talked to a Redditor who was entirely unfamiliar with the recent changes at Reddit.

I actually like that, and I like this about the Fediverse in general: Nothing wrong with YA-oriented media, but I’d rather limit my own online time to stuff - and to a level of debate - that ideally is oriented exclusively towards the topics I’m most interested in, personally.

I think that tends to be the starting point, but the user base is expanding quickly and is becoming way more diverse. There are already plenty of users who don’t fit in that category, and I suspect it will continue to grow.

Gen Z is really bad at technology, and I don’t know how long it will take them to get good.