• SpiceDealer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Bibi over here testing the limits of Godwin’s Law. Keep it up you fucking genocidal scum!

  • GrymEdm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    I’m sure AIPAC has told Netanyahu they won’t let US politicians stop the flow of money and arms to Israel (AIPAC is spending 100 million to keep progressives out of office). The criticism is just theater. Biden only started changing his language when people started voting “uncommitted” in battleground states, and he is still shipping arms to Israel every 36 hours. The Israeli blockade of humanitarian aid is barely mentioned officially, the air-dropped aid is woefully inadequate and little more than virtue signalling. 3 months ago, when Gazan civilian casualties were at 21,000+, Congress passed a bill making criticizing Zionism/Israel legally equal to antisemitism. All this shows that Netanyahu just needs to keep accepting aid and let Biden talk for political reasons until he’s re-elected.

  • yarr@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    Before starting a war, ask yourself what victory would look like. It appears here that the goal is wiping Gaza entirely and anything short of that will be construed as a loss.

    • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      That’s the goal?

      They are at 1.5% of the population of Gaza and daily death tolls have fallen month after month. If that’s the goal shouldn’t the killing apparatus become more effective and not 20% less so each month?

      Hmm, perhaps your reasoning is flawed.

      • yarr@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        They are at 1.5% of the population of Gaza and daily death tolls have fallen month after month. If that’s the goal shouldn’t the killing apparatus become more effective and not 20% less so each month?

        I’m sorry not enough people are getting killed efficiently enough for you. What do you think ‘Total Victory’ means for Israel here?

      • juicy@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        They’ve forced most of the population to Rafah on the southern border and are preparing an assault on the city while Egypt is preparing a walled camp just across the border to contain refugees. Sounds like they’re well on track.

        • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          9 months ago

          Yeah and Hamas leadership continues to use most of Gaza as a human shield. Hamas should have stayed in the north and met their fate, they’re cowards, hiring behind women and kids, but they traveled with the refugees.

      • SattaRIP@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Your argument is that there are so many dead that the IDF is killing people more slowly…

      • OccamsTeapot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        They are at 1.5% of the population of Gaza and daily death tolls have fallen month after month. If that’s the goal shouldn’t the killing apparatus become more effective and not 20% less so each month?

        If Israel was stupid then yeah they’d ramp up the killing after the ICJ ruled that it was a plausible case of genocide. If they were not stupid maybe they would slow down.

        So the question is: do you think Israel is stupid?

      • mlg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Yeah remember how when Hitler first shoved all the jews into concentration camps

        Then he let them suffer and die in those camps for a while

        Then he made dedicated death camps to kill them all

        So I guess we should wait until the death toll reaches at least 25% before we start to do anything just like how the allies definitely waited for Hitler to make death camps before fighting with his army.

  • RatBin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    9 months ago

    Large parts of the Israeli public want a deal, fearing that hostages are held in poor conditions and time is running out to bring them home alive.

    Are they even thinking at their own people themselves? It seems to me they want the total destruction of gaza, including the hostages cought in these massive operations.

  • BeautifulMind ♾️@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    “total victory” sure sounds like they’ve given some thought to their objectives and it’s no accident they’re killing lots of civilians

    • Asafum@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      “total victory” is no Palestinians and all the land.

      Fucking religion and real estate all mixed together and killing innocent people…

      Almost everything I hate about the world all in one disgusting package.

      • isles@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        There are so many justifications for fascism within religions (Maybe most especially, but not exclusively, Abrahamic)

    • MonsieurMack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      I wonder how synonymous “total victory” would be with “final solution” if this guy was German in the 1940s

      • febra@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        It surely reminds me of the Sportpalast Speech also known as the Total War Speech of Joseph Goebbles.

        Do you believe with the Führer and us in the final total victory of the German people? Are you and the German people willing to work, if the Führer orders, 10, 12 and if necessary 14 hours a day and to give everything for victory? Do you want total war? If necessary, do you want a war more total and radical than anything that we can even imagine today?

    • adONis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      actually…Israeli Hitler would be more appropriate. Not all Jews support Ben (and Israel in that matter) … But most Israelis do seem to support Ben, otherwise they could’ve just just gathered around the gov building and demanded his step-down.

      • pjwestin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        No, he’s pretty unpopular there, most polls say that Benny Gantz would beat him easily in an election. That doesn’t mean that they object to his approach to Gaza, or that Gantz would be any better for the Palestinian people.

  • Laura@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    total victory sounds like “wollt ihr den totalen krieg”

  • IndustryStandard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    And after all Palestinians in Gaza are murdered, Netanyahu will bring up that Hamas is also in the West Bank and Lebanon.

    • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      All Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank, too? At this rate it will take Israel another 67 years! And then also Lebanon? Lebanon has a million more people than Gaza and the West Bank combined. Won’t check the math on this one but that’ll make it like what, another 90 years.

    • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      9 months ago

      And after that, maybe Jordan. Then perhaps Syria. Fascists can’t stay in power without whipping up xenophobia.

  • NABDad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    77
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    Israel has decided to implement a “final solution” to the “Palestinian question”.

  • Conyak@lemmy.tf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    There will be no “total victory” without U.S. support. Don’t bite the hand that feeds you.

  • Dr. Dabbles@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    117
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    9 months ago

    Great, then we should stop funding their government and military spending. If they won’t stop, we can. Of course we won’t, but we could and should.

    • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      9 months ago

      I cannot find a single person on earth that can give a valid reason for sending them any money or armament whatsoever. We gain absolutely nothing from supporting them. Nothing at all.

      Conservatives cry crocodile tears about “wasting money”. Every penny ever sent to Israel has been wasted. It’s not an investment. There is no return. There is no political or financial gain of any kind for us.

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        I saw a comment the other day that she’d a lot of light on this. Us Military aid to Israel suppresses Israeli arms manufacturing, because they have less need, and boosts their reliance on US arms. It essentially promotes US arms sales not just in Israel, but across the world, as Israel has a fairly strong military industrial complex as is.

        Is this a good reason? That’s debatable. It’s a better reason than none though, and it makes things a lot clearer.

      • Maalus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        arrow-down
        17
        ·
        9 months ago

        US gains an ally in a very important region of the world. They have huge strategic value. Saying there is nothing is misguided.

        • fustigation769curtain@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          9 months ago

          Looks like allying with Israel has only been detrimental to the US. It’s been great for Zionists who need the US’ protection, though.

          Osama bin Laden cited US’ support for Israel as one of the reasons for the 9/11 attacks.

          Think about the billions, or perhaps trillions, of dollars the US has lost out on because of its support of Israel.

          We need to drop them like a bad habit.

          • Maalus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            14
            ·
            9 months ago

            Okay, what’s your point? I’m stating a fact. They have high strategic value. I don’t need to be convinced that it’s expensive or risky

            • SulaymanF@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              9 months ago

              You say they have value as an ally. What benefit has the alliance had for the US? Did Israel contribute soldiers to Iraq or Afghanistan? Did Israel support the Obama administration’s JCPOA or did they try to undermine it and kill it?

              It’s a one-way alliance.

        • cogman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          We have an ally next door, Jordan.

          We’d probably have more allies if we dropped support.

          What we are doing is equivalent to us deciding to support North Korea and being shocked that all of a sudden we lose regional support from just about everyone.

          Israel, especially with an ongoing genocide, is toxic to stability and alliances. It isolates more than it gives strategic advantage.

          • المنطقة عكف عفريت@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            Everyone keeps ignoring Jordan but it literally has the best cultural and economic relations with the US. Were they not even together in the anti ISIS coalition?

            But nope, Israeli lobbying is stronger than all of our voices combined.

          • Maalus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            9 months ago

            What do you mean, they are still there, the US can still use their shit if they need to.

            • ghostdoggtv@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              9 months ago

              Tactical value is fleeting. Israel is the reason we can’t afford anything for domestic civilians since 2001.

        • Kiosade@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          Why do we need to be involved in the region at all? We’ve only done more harm than good.

            • Kiosade@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              9 months ago

              Because you said they provide huge strategic value. What value is that? Why do we even need to have bases in that area to begin with?

              • Maalus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                Because it’s part of the US power projection. Asking that is like asking “why does the US need to do anything outside their borders”.

      • Dr. Dabbles@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        In theory, you could make an argument about defending the people living in a hostile region. In practice the government of Israel has been on a hard right slide for decades and have been openly denying basic human rights to the people stranded in Gaza.

        • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          In theory, you could make an argument about defending the people living in a hostile region.

          There are vulnerable groups in the middle east. Why lavish only this one with billions of dollars of munitions? We do not have any valid reason to support them any more than any other vulnerable group.

      • Seleni@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        Yes, there is. A lot of the higher-ups in government believe that Israel is necessary for the Rapture to take place. All the Jews will go there, and then get killed, and all the rich white men here will go to heaven.

        I wish I was even joking, but I’m not. They’ll keep Israel going at all costs because of this.

        • unphazed@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 months ago

          Seven Mountain followers want this fight to end horribly. They’re actually attempting to hasten it.

      • halferect@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Strategic Military advantage and I assume access to massad or some collaboration with them and if we stopped every Muslim country would eradicate Isreal at which point the same people yelling genocide Joe would be screaming for us to help Isreal. It’s global politics and its not black and white. Oh and global weapons sales, after all the united states government is more or less just a weapons dealer

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        9 months ago

        Keep protesting. It’s giving the political capital needed for US politicians to say “hey, maybe we should change our relationship with Israel, here”. I know that doesn’t sound like much, but in terms of world politics, it’s a huge change already for them to be able to say that.

      • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Sure you can you’re sticking your head in the sand.

        It’s to maintain Israel’s defensive posture as to Iran.

        Our weapons and money is not necessary for Israel to carpet bomb all of Gaza and the West Bank several times over before suspending aid altered Israel’s posture as to Gaza.

        So right now cotinued support is America’s only leverage. See? Not complicated at all.