Birds, fish, reptiles, amphibians, insects? Sure. But no mammals.
So I had to google it. Apparently, there is a sloth that moves around so slowly moss grows all over it and it doesn’t care. So it may appear green, but only in the sense that it wears it.
You must log in or register to comment.
This is an interesting question but I don’t think it is restricted to green. Isn’t the same true of purple, blue and red? I’m not talking about just reddish like human hair or a red panda but truly bright red like a cardinal. I would imagine it has something to do with our evolutionary history. Complete speculation here but laced with a few facts I picked up. I hear the common ancestor of mammals emerged around the time the dinosaurs became extinct and was basically a tiny rodent like a shrew. I wonder if as a small animal that can’t fly or swim it had to hide a lot and basically just came in shades of brown. So maybe any genes for other colors were lost before that common mammalian ancestor emerged and although mammals have lots of patterns they don’t have many colors.
Blue? Hello blue whales & dolphins? :)
Baboons have some bright reds and blues, but they are certainly the exception that proves the rule on mammal colors.
You’d think evolutionary, there would be at least some green mammals to help them blend into the plant life around them. Like bunnies hiding in bushes, or monkeys in trees. I suppose shades of brown work similarly in the same situations.
I know some predators don’t see color the same way humans do — could the lack of green and dominance of brown have something to do with seeing motion, or heat, or something else we don’t see?
iirc, the reason tigers are black and orange stripey is because deers and whatever else they eat don’t see orange, they see green. This blends the tiger in with the surroundings better.
That’s why hunters’ jackets are bright orange. Hides them from game (whilst simultaneously making them visible to other people)
At least humans have the highest sensitivity specifically around 555 nm (green).
This is just a guess, but could it be that brown is more useful since mammals (at least the first ones) dwell on and in the ground, where brown would be more beneficial for survival?
Right? I guess that’s what puzzles me the most about it. It must be really hard for mammals to become green since you would think it would confer an advantage in many environments you find them in.
I guess there are a lot of mammal species that kind of make themselves scarce during the broad daylight hours, so maybe green camouflage is less relevant if you’re only out between dusk and dawn?
They’re out there but it’s been hard to document their existence since they blend in so well with their environment. This natural camouflage is a double-edged sword, however: they may be able to avoid getting eaten by predators but it also makes reproduction particularly challenging since they have a hard time finding one another to do it like the Discovery channel.
Even when a potential breeding pair are able to meet up, their coupling is far from guaranteed due to the abundance of other green orifices in their usual habitats. Grass-covered mole tunnels, mossy logs with holes in them and bee nests in leafy trees have all been accidental natural fleshlights for these poor creatures. Like they say, it’s not easy being green.
Orions are demonstrably mammals, but unfortunately fictional.
You can’t prove that. Orions are real, do not slander the Word of the great prophet Roddenberry, Peace Be Upon Him.
I don’t know how relevant this is but I heard human eyes are very good at picking shades of green out. Maybe mammals are generally good at spotting greens and so hiding as a green thing doesn’t work as well. Just a guess though
From what other posters are saying, it may be the other way around? That is, most mammals cannot see green, so it doesn’t matter from a camouflage perspective among mammals. Humans (and primates in general) are an outlier in this repect.
Bird of prey can, though, so there’s that.
Word! That’s cool
I thought veritasium explained in his night vision video that this wasn’t the case? I’m not sure though.
I thought Veritasium was a Harry Potter spell but apparently I should have already known and watched a YouTube video before posting my silly thoughts.
I guess you’ve never heard of parrots. Or snakes. Or fish. Or insects.
You might have to look up the word “mammal”
You might need to read the post where I admitted I misread it as “animal,” due to being half asleep. Thank you, helpy helper.
I think you read mammals as animal
I did. My bad.
You’ll get’em next time.
None of those are mammals…
I’m guessing you misread the title as animals instead of mammals, and then didn’t read the actual post text
Not a single one of those is a mammal. I guess you have never heard of one.
Damn. I never knew that these were mammals…
Alan Davis?
Blue whales
Whoody Who?
https://youtu.be/0MDQp3fG4OI?si=tiVqzoE0m4p8F2Iu
Sorry it’s a short, couldn’t find a proper clip
Here is an alternative Piped link(s):
https://piped.video/0MDQp3fG4OI?si=tiVqzoE0m4p8F2Iu
Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
I’m open-source; check me out at GitHub.
This may have already been covered but whilst there might not be mammals that appear green to human eyes there are certainly mamals that appear green to the prey/predators in their environment.
Perfect example is a tiger who (to us) stands out like a sore thumb with its orange fur but is perceived as green with black stripes through the eyes of its prey, making it very well camouflaged in the jungle.
Do you mean my cats are actually green in the eyes of it’s potential prey?
walking 🥑
It’s an avocato.
We might not be looking at them with the right eyes
Wow, that is fascinating!
Makes me wonder about the other direction, going into the near infrared as opposed to UV. I remember from a class in remote sensing that many plants are actually most reflective in that band (more so than in green, even). NIR air photos are often used by biologists to get an indication of the health of a forest. But I have no idea whether animals also reflect NIR? It may be that most animals cannot see in that band in the first place, so it would not offer any camouflage advantage.
Does it count if they are glowing bunnies?
“yes uhh… We need to make bunnies that glow in the dark… for medicine… Yess.”
Ha!! You really had to go down the “rabbit hole” for that one I bet! Awesome.
What about the Hulk???
Not a mammal, he hatched from a green egg
The ones from Dr Seuss
Wouldn’t that make him a monotreme?
Very nice read, thanks
So I skimmed that and it seems the tldr is mammals have melanin (and I’m guessing the other animals don’t)
Great read! That explains a lot.
I’ve been deep diving a bit myself and found this article that explains another thing that’s puzzled me over the years. Some birds have crazy vibrant coloration that almost glistens, like peacock feathers. Outside of the zoo, I’ve noticed it a bit in common grackles. They look black on first glance, but when you study them closely, they have this kind of purple sheen around their heads. Apparently, it’s still melanin at work here, but it’s structured in a very special way.
What about Shrek
He’s an onion
Blue. And wales and dolphins do not count, they are not land mammals and they are barely blue.
I think you’re right. I can’t think of a single green mammal. Why can we have green or blue eyes, but not other things?
Algae-covered sloths are about as close as you get.
