• Pixlbabble@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Seriously that’s some 80s shit my sister was into but she’s 9 years older than me, meanwhile it was more Biggie and Wu-Tang for me when they dropped around 93-94 when I was a teen. It was all baggy clothes.

    • DudePluto@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Give them a break, they had no other accepted way to explore their sexuality

      /s but also not /s

      • azertyfun@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah that’s just facts. This Bowie type shit is ANYTHING BUT straight, that’s what makes it iconic.
        The straights have always copied/been inspired by queer fashion, just like white america with black american music genres (jazz, rock, blues, r&b, rap).

        • DudePluto@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Absolutely, there’s a long history of the “in-group” co-opting culture from the “out-group” because it’s seen as exotic and transgressive. Was it hypocritical for such a homophobic generation to idolize queer icons, only so long as they were cool and made good music? On a cultural level, yeah. On an individual level, depends on the individual and their specific beliefs and actions

      • jcg@halubilo.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Given a better quality photo, the women on the left and right really wouldn’t be out of place nowadays.

      • Wanderer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The boomer’s had everything better. That fashion works for me.

        But everyone was so much thinner back then. The average person was so much hotter.

        The only thing that’s really improved is people’s teeth.

        • DudePluto@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          1 year ago

          But everyone was so much thinner back then. The average person was so much hotter.

          Because they inherited an economy with actual food and replaced it with “food” filled with industrial inventions like corn syrup

    • vd1n@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      And these are the ones scared of gender/LGBTQ politics… We know why now…

      • livus@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Is… is that the rep we have? I sort of thought that was boomers and just, well, bigots from every generation. Gen X was also sex positive feminism 3rd wave and the beginning of intersectionalism.

        • vd1n@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Guess it depends on where you live. I find a lot of people around me that are 45 and up and don’t live in a more wealthy area are basically that way.

          I saw a lot flip sides since 2020… From being open minded to closed. From repping Obama to repping trump and the coup.

          It’s really weird to be honest.

          • Nowyn@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            I don’t think it is about flipping a coin between open-minded and close-minded but about radicalization. While it is harder to see with QAnon, radicalization be it right, left (although you have to go really far on the horseshoe), or religious is staunchly anti-intellectualistic. Once you believe in ideas or at least do not see them as really distasteful, it gets easier to go towards more and more batshit insane ideas.

            While I am not sure if there is actual research on how age affects radicalization, research on radicalization has identified certain things that make it likelier for a person to be radicalized. Vulnerability, marginalization, and othering are all pretty common. To extend it there might be an age group vulnerability of 45 and up age group because of either being empty nesters or kids at least starting to be a lot more independent.

            There is also somewhat of a domino effect. People like to be part of a group. If people don’t give any legitimacy to radicalized viewpoints, it makes it harder to be radicalized. The problem with this is also how hidden ideas can become mainstream as has at least in Western countries happened with the alt-right, they can reach a scary critical mass. Once you have been tempered with completely crazy viewpoints at one point thinking JFK Jr will be resurrected is not that weird anymore.

            Over a decade ago when I started to get really worried about the rise of fascism in the West, my mom thought I was insane. Now we have had (not American) actual neo-Nazi as minister and no one of the ministerial parties thought it was a huge enough deal to actually not do it. In my books that means they all are neo-Nazies. My mom also doesn’t think I am insane anymore. The tools they used to gain power are not new. We are just not taught to identify them. I was because it would be a pretty bad idea to have someone in my profession if not aware of signs of radicalization.

            • Cabrio@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Even education can only do so much to make up for a complete lack of cognitive ability.

            • Cabrio@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Even education can only do so much to make up for a complete lack of cognitive ability.

            • Cabrio@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Even education can only do so much to make up for a complete lack of cognitive ability.

            • Cabrio@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Even education can only do so much to make up for a complete lack of cognitive ability.

            • Cabrio@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Even education can only do so much to make up for a complete lack of cognitive ability.

              • Nowyn@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                1 year ago

                We really need to step out of the idea that radicalization only happens to people who are somehow slow or uneducated. It might make you more likely to fall for it, but cognitive ability and education will not mean you will not end up there as well. Issue with the anti-intellectualism of the alt-right is not if someone themselves has education but if they are willing to listen to other people who do. If no one is an expert for example racist ideas of the alt-right about biological differences can’t be refuted. Which is probably partially where it comes from times quite a lot.

                Everyone likes to think they have cognitive ability. If we just think radicalization happens only to stupid people, and you are not stupid, getting a person de-radicalized is going to be a lot harder. Thinking that we as people with cognitive ability can’t be radicalized will also make it easier to fall for it because you can’t be radicalized.

                Instead of intelligence or education, we should focus on the trifecta of vulnerability, marginalization, and othering. That’s a better predictor.

                (And no, I do not actually disagree about the ideas being idiocy, just that falling for them are not just for idiots)

                • Cabrio@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  I disagree on the fundamental level that if someone “intelligent” chooses to follow the ideas of idiocy it’s not proof that the intelligent can be swayed, but that the individual is objectively less intelligent that previously assumed. This is reinforced when someone more intelligent isn’t swayed by said idiocy.

          • Duamerthrax@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’ve also seen a lot of self identified progressive Xers and boomers that need to be explicitly taught these things. One was a terf before he looked around as his fellow terfs. Another was oddly possessive of Bugs Bunny in drag when he found out that some consider that episode a pro-trans episode. A whole lot of them don’t pick up on the anti environmental subtext in their comic book movies.

          • livus@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yikes that sounds rough!

            We have had problems over here where we lose people down an antivax q-anon abbit hole, but it seems to affect all ages. I think maybe it has something to do with underlying mental health vulnerabilities.

      • Wanderer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think back then you could do “gay” things without being seen as gay so it was okay.

        It was okay to dress like that if everyone knew you were out smashing loads of chicks.

        But not people are going to think you’re gay so it’s really different.

  • TimeSquirrel@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    This was like, 5% of millennials. Trust me, I was one of them. We got our asses kicked for dressing this way. Most everyone else either did “gangsta” style with low-hanging pants and Timberland boots/Jordans, or “preppy” style with a boring-ass polo shirt and khakis.

    • socsa@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Emocore stuff was also later on and seen generally as a pop-poser spinoff of punk and metal culture. It got uniquely hated on by both mainstream and alternative cliques because of this.

      I personally went through a pretty extended punk phase and never really got picked on. I actually made plenty of friends with jocks and stoners in high school, while wearing a pretty cringe getup with operation Ivy patches and shit.

      • TimeSquirrel@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I gravitated toward nu-metal/industrial with wide leg JNCO pants and ball-chain necklaces.

        I haven’t even heard of “emo” being an actual style until now. I thought it was just goth. Maybe because it’s a couple years after my time. I’m an older millennial, graduated high school in 2000.

        • Rinox@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, I’d say Emo really got going after 2000, at least in my experience

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Psh, I saw this and immediately thought " I would have wanted to date that girl back in the day". Now I think… “If I met a girl who was my age rocking that style… I would want to talk to them for sure”

      -born in 89’

      • ikiru@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Same. Also born in 1989 and I would have had a huge crush on this girl in 2006. Haha

      • Obi@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah the emo look definitely worked for me… We didn’t have a lot of them in my country though, the alt style was more punk/dirty techno, or metalheads but the girls didn’t look like that. Shame…

    • InputZero@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Don’t forget about thrift store style! Which wasn’t a style back then. Advantage though, us thrift store kids could switch styles daily. ‘Gangsta’ Monday, ‘emo’ Wednesday, poser Friday.

        • InputZero@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Pretty much lol. Only instead of going to the store to try you just end up with what you get and make it work from there.

    • Nihilistic_Mystics@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t know where people grew up that actually had cliques like that. It was just t-shirts and shorts or jeans while I was in school. There was no real trend chasing or trying to look gangster. Southern California here.

      • Kiosade@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Same haha. I do vaguely remember people looking like a much, much more toned down version of this, but yeah this shit was mostly relegated to Youtubers and Hot Topic models.

  • zanyllama52@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    The use of the word aesthetic as a verb in the last several years blows my mind.

    Anyhow, yeah, we dress different when we’re kids. I don’t think too many people are shocked by this.

  • Ugh@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Aw, it’s Ambrehhhh! I still follow her on YouTube (I think, if she still has a channel) and Instagram, lol.

  • ezmack@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ll paraphrase a twitter comment: man I did not give a single fuck about gen x as a millenial, these posts are so weird. Maybe we’re just more exposed to each other now because of social media

    • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m convinced that news outlets and big tech intentionally push ageism / generational-warfare to substitute for class warfare, and divert criticism away from capitalists.

      Like who decided to mark off these year ranges and put labels on them anyway, it’s completely arbitrary and meaningless.

      • steveman_ha@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Allow me to offer a different perspective from the previous reply: holy frickin shit, I honestly never noticed this before. Tbh I’m not sure about the intentionality behind it though.

        I mean, who exactly is intentionally doing this? Intent is important here; if it’s not individually-assignable, and say emerges from a complex series of interactions between various other policies, or instances of individual decision-making - for example - then it seems hard to reasonably place “blame” like that.

        This doesn’t preclude taking action against the companies which will be salient for them (e.g. puts financial viability in question, rather than BS fines that amount to parking tickets)… I mean corporations are people too, now, right? Just a thought on how to argue/clarify the premise.

        Because otherwise… Yeah, wtf. A lot of dividing lines, a lot of material insecurity, and so on, and nobody has the time - let alone the resources AND perspective simultaneously - to challenge the real dynamic. One which arguably IS being perpetrated with individual intent at multiple scales, and with cancerous impacts (figuratively and literally) on the societies which enable and tolerate them.

      • gamer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        I hope you’re being sarcastic because that kind of deranged conspiracy theory nonsense being taken seriously is why this country is so comprehensively fucked in the head.

        …also, the whole genx/millenial/genz/etc labels are specifically a thing from marketing. They teach that stuff in business schools because it actually is useful to divide a population like that. The edges are gray, but people squarely in the middle of one of those demographics are more likely to be caricatures of it.

        • ZombieTheZombieCat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          deranged conspiracy theory nonsense

          They teach that stuff in business schools because it actually is useful to divide a population like that

          Hmm

    • livus@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      Demographically there were way more millenials than genx.

      The cohorts that are demographic bulges (boomers, millennials) get a lot of media attention (because advertising) and it plays out.

    • Manu@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      To be fair: The scene was much smaller back then and many emo kids were basically scorned and beaten for the emo and scene aesthetic.

      • Yuki@kutsuya.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yup… It was the main reason I stopped wearing make up and dressing like that. The bullying became unbearable.

        Would be fun to try it again now, though… But I’m 30 so it’ll probably look dumb lol

        • thegiddystitcher@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m nearly 40 and rediscovering my inner goth. Honestly don’t care if it looks “dumb”, I’m having a lot of fun! Just go for it, do what makes you happy.

          • LifeBandit666@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I’m right there with you. I had been saying to my Wife I was gonna start wearing black nail varnish again at 39 and she basically said don’t.

            Started a new job, bloke with a pretty long beard and hair down my back, some older guy takes me under his wing and basically tells me to just be myself, the company loves it. I was showing up to work in a black turtleneck to look a bit more professional and nice than I am.

            I had smashed my nails in at work trapping my fingers and had 2 black nails anyway so I just went for it.

            Now I’m rocking up to work in a leather jacket and Army boots, Management love me and they’ve taken me off the Agency books and onto theirs.

            Not all that Gothy but I’m definitely embracing my inner child more, and Fuck what anyone thinks. I’ve had a team leader tell me I can wear a dress to work if I like lol

            • thegiddystitcher@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              Now the natural question here is…has the wife come around? When I declared my desire for a “summer goth cruise witch” aesthetic I’m happy to report my husband was all for it lol.

              • LifeBandit666@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Oh absolutely she has, it’s just all about trying to keep my inner child in check before I do something silly. She’s the matriarch of a house of boys so she generally takes a stance against silliness whereas I’m usually for it.

                While she may make disparaging comments when I’m sat watching TV and doing my nails, she’s also said “I think you look really fit in that picture” about pictures where I’m in full blown Festival garb with my long hair (which she was against me growing) flowing down my back.

                In fact, it’s got her going through her own clothes and starting to wear some stuff she usually wouldn’t too. I think she saw that I didn’t get my head kicked in like we did when we were kids and thought “huh”

              • LifeBandit666@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Oh absolutely she has, it’s just all about trying to keep my inner child in check before I do something silly. She’s the matriarch of a house of boys so she generally takes a stance against silliness whereas I’m usually for it.

                While she may make disparaging comments when I’m sat watching TV and doing my nails, she’s also said “I think you look really fit in that picture” about pictures where I’m in full blown Festival garb with my long hair (which she was against me growing) flowing down my back.

                In fact, it’s got her going through her own clothes and starting to wear some stuff she usually wouldn’t too. I think she saw that I didn’t get my head kicked in like we did when we were kids and thought “huh”

        • Pitri@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          1 year ago

          The tendency of society to bully people into conformity is honestly one of its worst traits.

          why can humans be so incredibly shitty? 😞

        • Manu@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah the bullying was my main reason as well. I mean you could still rock that aesthetic to a show, but the most I feel comfortable to do nowadays is black nail polish, lol. I could get away with more on stage probably, but I won’t feel comfortable like that now to be honest. The anxiety and bad experiences cut too deep I guess.

          • Yuki@kutsuya.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            I might go and try it out next week, still got my old clothes somewhere maybe…

            • LifeBandit666@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              Just dig it out and add bits of it to what you usually wear day to day. You don’t have to go full 2006.