• NeptuneOrbit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    189
    ·
    7 months ago

    Well it had the most up votes! So clearly it was the most generally useful and true response in the whole thread!

    • Norgur@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      65
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      7 months ago

      Because on Reddit (and here on Lemmy) people use up and downvotes exclusively to rate the quality of a post, not as a tool to show disapproval without having to be able to actually articulate why. I like when social interactions go exactly as intended - like in this case - and don’t devolve into two people arguing with silent mobs behind them.

      /s for everyone who’s as blind to sarcasm as this shitty AI from Google.

      • NeptuneOrbit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        44
        ·
        7 months ago

        Humor IS a quality though. Human voters are able, in aggregate, able to award certain types of humor. Which an LLM is not able to. Which gets recycled with no context, as fact.

        The internet would be a vastly different place if sarcasm and in jokes were not regarded as a type of “quality” content.

        • pory@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          Well, there’s an oddly existential argument to be made that “funny” AI answers like this or adding a pot of Elmer’s Glue to pizza sauce to get the cheese to stick are valued. Simply because those are the posts I’ve seen from Google AI, and I’ve never touched the feature myself.

          By letting a language “speaker” learn from Reddit and forums, we created an approximation of “that guy who thinks he’s a comedian” because that guy is always there and always drowns in upvotes. Clearly, he’s a valuable part of the discourse!

  • bleistift2@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    95
    ·
    7 months ago

    And we thought boomers reading shit off Facebook was bad. Now they have AI feeding it to them.

    • Hugh_Jeggs@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      32
      ·
      7 months ago

      boomers reading shit off Facebook

      Says a generation that believes everything a YouTuber tells them lol

      Not a boomer btw

      • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        38
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        It seems so absurd to me this could happen. For the boomers I understand, they grew up in an offline world, but the youth? They are raised on the modern web and smartphones but are often clueless too.

        Was it the unsanitized, wild west internet era of the late 90s/early 2000s that hardened the millennials against online bullshitting?

      • Kallioapina@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        What generation? I’m an elder millenial and I always thought Google Video/Vimeo/Youtube was/is shit for any kind of actual informential content. Music videos, meme videos - sure. Other than that, veeerrry great amount of suss on any info presented. Same goes for 90+% of people of my generation, who know what kind of a jokepool 90’s/early 2000’s internet was.

        So what gen are you referring to?

        • snooggums@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          7 months ago

          You have to learn how to filter out the rage bait and trash content, but you have to do that offline too.

          • GiveMemes@jlai.lu
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            7 months ago

            Yeah personally I’ve found a ton of informational and useful content on YT. There’s tons of lectures and presentations available from different colleges and stuff, but there’s also just a ton of people that like to spread info. For example, I found one guy thats making his own audiobooks of leftist literature to make it more accessible for the average Joe.

        • Ajen@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          7 months ago

          YouTube is a decent source of info for some subjects, like vehicle maintenance and 3d printing. Of course it still depends on the channel/creator…

    • thefartographer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Google: You know those LLMs?

      Engineer: Yes, what about it?

      G: So I took one of those and I vomited diarrhea into its mouth-

      E: Wait, what?

  • Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    7 months ago

    My new peak is the chance that I’ll see some comment I made on Reddit be famous in this way.

    As long as it doesn’t hurt anyone.

      • Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        7 months ago

        I wouldn’t sell it and give Reddit the pleasure of it ever logging in again. And it’s near OG age.

        Plus I probably doxxed myself to myself over the years.

        • can@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 months ago

          Plus I probably doxxed myself to myself over the years.

          I liked to switch accounts periodically so depending on which one struck I may be fine

  • usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    122
    ·
    7 months ago

    If you look at the reddit post it’s citing, it’s from r/shittysuperpowers. A subreddit where you come up with fake shitty super powers is now getting cited as truth by google

  • sh__@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    From my understanding these aren’t because that is trained into the ai. I believe it is just looking at a few pages in the moment and summarizing from there, obviously doing a poor job at guessing the relevancy. Somewhat of a fix would be stop taking pages from reddit.

    • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      7 months ago

      Here’s the thing. You said a “jackdaw is a crow.”

      Is it in the same family? Yes. No one’s arguing that.

      As someone who is a scientist who studies crows, I am telling you, specifically, in science, no one calls jackdaws crows. If you want to be “specific” like you said, then you shouldn’t either. They’re not the same thing.

      If you’re saying “crow family” you’re referring to the taxonomic grouping of Corvidae, which includes things from nutcrackers to blue jays to ravens.

      So your reasoning for calling a jackdaw a crow is because random people “call the black ones crows?” Let’s get grackles and blackbirds in there, then, too.

      Also, calling someone a human or an ape? It’s not one or the other, that’s not how taxonomy works. They’re both. A jackdaw is a jackdaw and a member of the crow family. But that’s not what you said. You said a jackdaw is a crow, which is not true unless you’re okay with calling all members of the crow family crows, which means you’d call blue jays, ravens, and other birds crows, too. Which you said you don’t.

      It’s okay to just admit you’re wrong, you know?