• PlaidBaron@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    4094 divided by 2 is 2047 male anscestors. The average volume of semen per ejaculation is roughly 3 mL on average.

    2047 x 3 is 6141 mL of cum or 6.14 L of cum or about a gallon and a half.

    The average fuel efficiency for cars in the US (sorry Europeans) is 25 mpg. This means if cum had the same energy density as gasoline you could travel roughly 37.5 miles on all the cum your male anscestors produced in the last 400 years.

    • odium@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      That’s only one ejaculation per male ancestor. You can safely assume that the average male ancestor ejaculated more than once. This would increase the distance traveled using the cum energy.

      • Tofubeef@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        According to Leitzmann et al 2004 the average number of male ejaculations in lifetime is approximately 8700 times. That would be 26,1 litres of cum per male.

        Edit: 2047 male ancestors would have produced roughly 53 427 litres of cum. Do we have data on energy density of cum?

        • xantoxis@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I think it’s fair to include jizz blown into your 12 generations of grandmas prior to your conception, though, because that cum was necessary to eventually lead to you being born. Scientifically speaking I think we’re talking about all the man mayo that went into your grandma’s hoochie coochie prior to your conception, but excluding any baby batter that went into the making of your previous older sibling. So we’re only counting the clam sauce that led directly to you, not any of your siblings or any other combination of parents.

        • xantoxis@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Not even inbreeding, strictly speaking, when you go back that far. At 12 generations back you’ve got lots of ancestors with common ancestors, but they aren’t so closely related that conceiving a child between them would be incest. Doesn’t have to be siblings; very distant cousins would also reduce the number of total ancestors. They need not even have known their relation to one another.

          • Tavarin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            By second cousins the rate of genetic abnormalities is the same as for distant strangers. You really don’t have to go very far back for it to not cause issues.

    • FreeFacts@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      1 year ago

      With 12 generations, that would apply to pretty much everyone. It would be a statistical anomaly for anyone living today to have the full set of 4094 individual ancestors.

  • TheRealLinga@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m having trouble understanding this. Why would I need 4 grandparents?.. oh… because 2 had a kid and 2 had a kid… then the 2 kids were my parents… so double that for great grandparents…

    Damn I just answered it to myself. Guess I shouldn’t ask questions while half awake