• The US announced deployments of new long-range fires weapons to Germany will start in 2026.
  • The capabilities will include the SM-6, Tomahawk, and developmental hypersonic weapons.
  • The war in Ukraine has shown a need for more deep-strike options.
  • XNX@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    5 months ago

    So the afd can have these weapons when they’re in power? Great…

      • dEVbiKub@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        That’s reassuring, the splendid democracy US of A has proven to always elect reliable and trustworthy presidents, who has the ultimate authority over such weapons! Totally looking forward for the upcoming election, both candidates are great, especially the orange one!

    • roboto@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Idk why you’re getting so many downvotes, we’re like 2-3 elections away from having fascists and literal Nazis, among them e.g. people who are descendants of NSDAP officials and convicted war criminals (Beatrix von Storch). The situation is bleak in Germany.

  • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    5 months ago

    It’s a good spot. Fairly close to many threats and in a stable country that is a strong ally.

    • Yrt@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      And also there is still a big US infrastructure at hand with all the bases.

      • madcaesar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        Hehe that’s an understatement. I think we have like an entire city there full of American soldiers.

        • Yrt@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          Multiple cities. At least Ramstein and Spangdahlem are really big and could count as a small city. That’s why I said there is still a good infrastructure even after a lot of US soldiers were sent home and bases got closed in the last few years.

        • HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 months ago

          Well given what Germany did for an entire half century not long ago and what Russia did in close proximity it’s understandable

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    The planned deployment of new weapons systems to Germany follows the collapse of the INF Treaty and comes as NATO learns key lessons from the war in Ukraine, one being the value of ground-launched long-range strike options.

    The US and Germany released a statement on Wednesday on the coming “episodic deployments of the long-range fires capabilities of its Multi-Domain Task Force in Germany in 2026, as part of planning for enduring stationing of these capabilities in the future.”

    The US withdrawal from the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty in 2019, which Washington accused Moscow of violating, allowed it to begin developing and fielding new ground-launched ballistic and cruise missiles with ranges between 500 and 5,500 kilometers.

    Fabian Hoffman, a doctoral research fellow with the Oslo Nuclear Project, explained in a War on the Rocks commentary last year that “the ability to engage targets at operational and strategic depth critically enables the conduct of offensive and defensive maneuvers and can shape the conditions for victory on the battlefield.”

    But, he said, “European states have long ignored the shift towards stand-off range and precision strike in modern war.”

    New efforts are presently underway, though, and as Timothy Wright and Zuzanna Gwadera with the International Institute of Strategic Studies wrote recently, “NATO member states are reversing decades of surface-to-surface missile and rocket-inventory cuts by acquiring new capabilities.”


    The original article contains 404 words, the summary contains 224 words. Saved 45%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yeah, please make Germany more vulnerable to Russia! We need Europe ruled by Putin who is definitely a benevolent and friendly guy and not a ruthless dictator.

      • hairynipple@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        5 months ago

        Germany vulnerable to Russia, really? Russia can barely take on Ukraine but now it’s a threat to Germany? Putting NATO missiles in Germany has more to do with US power projection than defense for Germany.

          • Avero@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 months ago

            I’m pretty sure they also know they would be flattened if they decide to nuke a European country

            • Match!!@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              Russia claims to have 6000 nukes. Let’s pretend they have 50 working ones. If they detonate 1 of them, will the EU really flatten them while they’re waving 49 more?

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              5 months ago

              Well as long as you’re pretty sure, I don’t think there’s anything for anyone to worry about.

              You do have the relevant experience and education when it comes to foreign relations and military strategy, right? Otherwise we might be putting our trust in the wrong person.

              • Mangoholic@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                Look its pretty simple, you don’t want your country to be a big threat/strategic target for Putin.