Authorities in the South American nation of Ecuador have confirmed that an oil spill released about 1,200 barrels into the Pacific, contaminating kilometres of oceanfront.

Rafael Armendariz, transportation manager for the state-owned oil firm Petroecuador, confirmed on Thursday that the incident took place a day earlier when a tank in the marine terminal in the port of Esmeraldas surpassed its capacity.

“It is estimated that around 1,200 barrels were spilled,” Armendariz said at a press conference. “Not all of them fell onto the beach. A part was contained by the pool inside of Petroecuador’s facilities.”

About half of the crude spilled out of Petroecuador’s facilities, spreading across about 4km (2.5 miles) of Las Palmas Beach, a popular destination for recreation and tourists.

An investigation into the cause of the spill is taking place. General Manager Ramon Correa said problems like negligence, mechanical damage or sabotage could not yet be ruled out.

Esmeraldas is about 150km (93 miles) south of Ecuador’s northern border with Colombia. The company says it has controlled 90 percent of the spill’s impact on land and 60 percent at sea through initial cleanup efforts.

Environmental Minister Jose Davalos told the TV station Ecuavisa the spill could affect wildlife such as birds and crustaceans. He expected the cleanup to take about a week.

Davalos noted that he is awaiting an assessment from Petroecuador before deciding on appropriate penalties.

    • player2@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      I used to work in the oilfield and my reaction was also, oh, only 1200 bbls? That amount is pretty small in terms of the spills we saw or heard about locally regularly, however that was in the middle of North Dakota and this is on a beach and ocean marine life which makes this so much worse.

      • BobKerman3999@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Don’t worry: someone will show up to tell us that mining lithium is much worse for the environment

        • A_A@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes ! exactly ! /s
          So … let’s burn all the oil until 99% of us are in climatic catastrophes ! /s
          ( Obviously your comment is also sarcasm )

      • A_A@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        no, not in North Dakota … :
        “Authorities in the South American nation of Ecuador have confirmed …”

        Edit : Oups ! Sorry for that. Thanks to @Alto@kbin.social for calling this.

        Ok @player2@lemmy.world i think I get it this time :

        Name enviro. Nb. barrels bad ?
        D.W.Horizon at sea 4.9e6 1k x😬
        Ecuador beach 1.2e3 😑
        N.Dakota on land 1.2e3 🙄
        • player2@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Aside from actually hurting animals, a beach spill is really bad optics / PR. I know it won’t really impact the earth as a whole, natural oil seeps let lots of oil into the ocean every day, but beach spills make headlines.

        • Alto@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          I believe they were referring to the spills they had personally seen/heard about.

      • A_A@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        You think we are a failure ? Say that to the dinosaurs : they had millions of years and never built Rockets to prevent asteroids from destroying them. We did it in just a few thousand years.

        • pepperonisalami@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think he just meant that we are a failure to our own ideals, for such a smart species we failed to be responsible or keep these companies accountable. Lets say that dinosaurs had millions of years of existence and we achieved more in thousands of years, but wouldn’t it be a shame if our achievements is what led us to our own extinction? Icarus’s fall would be nothing in comparison to ours, and that in itself can be considered a failure.

          • A_A@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Constructive criticism of our own species is very good … I don’t want it to become a social disease. Young generations have mental issues and anxiety looking toward the future.

            • pepperonisalami@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Well, I totally agree with you. I somewhat fall into that category as well (younger-ish generation anxious for the future).

              • Quokka@quokk.au
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                I’m a Millennial and I feel sorry for Zoomers and they’re only a few years younger than me.

                Those Alphas are fucked if this rapid spiral downward trend continues.

          • krzschlss@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            yea… something like this. We are the smartest on this planet I guess, but not smart enough to punish those responsible for poisoning and destroying the world we live in. Or at least destroy these companies with no possibility for them to revive themselves with different logos and slogans. Why the forgiveness for such acts of greed and no regard for biological life? Those running these companies and the governments that protect them at all cost don’t have time to care about you while they count the dollars they earned by taking our human rights away from under our noses.

    • trainsaresexy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      1,200 barrels is about 2,040 MWh.

      4.9 million is 8.3 million MWh.

      1 MWh can power a house for about a month or toast 89,000 slices of bread.


      Possibly first time in my life I’ve seen someone use _ instead of , in number format.