• doctorskull@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    162
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    HOW IS THIS A SHOWER THOUGHT?

    Honestly, does this community have active moderation? Feels like the majority of content posted here is almost never consistent with the spirit of a legitimate shower thought.

  • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Careful what you use for prompts. These are companies who would surely give up/sell your data the moment LEO asked.

    • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      No you can’t. They won’t work with pictures of real people. I tried to get it to show me my own selfie with a different haircut and it won’t do it for pretty obvious reasons.

      • Dkarma@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        Yes you can you fool. Imagine thinking online sources like chatgpt are the only way to do this.

        Lol

      • Theo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 days ago

        There are some that do allow it. Ideogram’s image upload used to be on the free plan but now it is 16/month. But for free, you can use Ideogram for celebrities. There are also some NSFW ones too with free plans. I did your simulation on Leonardo AI, but it only returned images of Che. To get the same effect as his pictures, describe what he was wearing, and the background in most of the images with Luigi as the subject. Leonardo gives 150 free credits which can be ~15 to 30 prompts per day depending on which models you use.

        Here’s Aubrey Plaza as a Smurf (it is the closest one, lol, AI is still a toddler of a technology):

  • TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    using A.I. to be creative is like using debit card to buy things.

    you have to ask for permission from a corporation to use it first.

    • Grimy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      Using debit cards to buy things? I don’t get what you mean. Convenient?

      In any case, there are numerous uncensored open source options you can run on your own computer or a rented GPU online, and there are already multiple Loras on civit.ai of him. A Lora is an adapter you can put on a model that teaches it what the subject looks like.

    • freethemedia@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      I unironically love the first one.

      The most effective way to teach a child is via natural consequences.

      May this become a symbol of the natural consequence of planet destroying greed.

    • granolabar@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Are you suggesting that content moderation policy is actually a censorship apparatus?

      As if the mods have guides on how “moderate”

      In post modern, subjectivist world we accepted meaning of the words assigned to them by the ruling class.

      health “insurance” Department of “defense” “career” “pro life” “pro choice” “terrorist” “news”

  • jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Cloud computing, web services, are just a fancy way of saying other people’s computers.

    When you use other people’s computers you have to follow their rules, better to run things locally for independence

  • Boomkop3@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    I have stable diffusion on my pc at home, it’s uncensored and offline. I can run some prompts trough if you like?

    I can’t promise the results would be great tho