• granolabar@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 days ago

    I love bow this meme gets fact checked and the thesis get tighter.

    Brian Thompson is a parasite, no empathy for them

  • Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    75
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    21 days ago

    My personal tinfoil hat is that they are seeking the death penalty so he accepts a deal. They are scared of jury nullification.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      20 days ago

      That’s normal though. I mean it shouldn’t be, but they always go as hard as they can hoping you’ll plead guilty to avoid a trial. When they say the death penalty is meant to dissuade criminals, they know it doesn’t work on crimes. It works on getting guilty pleas.

    • wolfpack86@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      19 days ago

      They haven’t said they are seeking the death penalty. They have charged him with a crime where they could seek it.

      But I agree they’re pushing for a deal.

    • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 days ago

      That isn’t tinfoil-hat at all. I was reading a news story recently about how worried they are that they’ll have trouble finding impartial jurors, since there’s so much sympathy for him.

      • SLVRDRGN@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        20 days ago

        How exactly does this work? How do they determine someone to be impartial? If they weed out people for having sympathy but keep people who don’t, aren’t they making that jury partial to finding him guilty?

        • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          20 days ago

          The jury is supposed to be unbiased, i.e. not favoring one side or the other. Obviously, it’s impossible to get a jury that’s completely impartial, especially in a case that’s as high-profile as this one, but they have to try.

          They ask the jurors questions and then each side has the opportunity to remove ones that they deem problematic.

  • Hlodwig@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    21 days ago

    FFS, it’s not even him, people need to stop accepting he is the killer. He is not, news made sure that pics from the killing footage were buried so people would forgot them, because when you compare them with Luigi, its obviously NOT him… And there is no doubt here, killer is smaller, whiter (like Irish white), slim eyebrows, and less muscle body shape than Luigi.

    Why do people try to make him a martyr, when it is not even the killer.

  • Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    21 days ago

    Shouldn’t there be leniency for killing a killer?
    Yes I know it’s about “sending a message”, but messages go both ways.

      • blandfordforever@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        21 days ago

        When the killing is in self defense or in the defense of many, many victims, is this called justifiable homicide?

    • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      21 days ago

      Yeah, because the US “justice” system famously never treats juvenile defendants as adults in order to mete out draconian punishment that eliminates all chances for rehabilitation…

      • Amon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        21 days ago

        And they have definitely ratified the UNCRC because they definitely do not want to put kids in adult prisons, right?

      • Logi@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        21 days ago

        The US Supreme Court prevented people who committed crimes as juveniles from being executed a number of years ago. Trump’s group might change that, but for now it is the law. They technically cannot be incarcerated forever either.

    • atrielienz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      21 days ago

      https://apnews.com/article/unitedhealthcare-ceo-killing-luigi-mangione-terrorism-law-7fcb28dcc0106c980b6ecf4aa9cf682f

      That doesn’t mean they can’t be tried as terrorists. The main problem here is actually whether or not the facts of the crime actually allow for a terrorism charge. Fact is, he had a manifesto (see ideological goals), and the shooting was a violent criminal act.

      According to the FBI that’s all it takes. It may also be what is lacking in the case of some school shooters.

      While I am generally on the side of “CEO FAFO”, I recognize that the problem here is that the FBI and the laws they follow are flawed (probably deliberately) in such a way that they only target those who target the wealthy.

      Shooting up a school is an act of terrorism if you do it because you’re targeting a soft target in an attempt to hurt the local, state or federal government or you’re religiously motivated etc. But not if you were bullied.

      There’s been plenty of over 18 mass shooters who also haven’t been charged with terrorism. And with each one there’s people who will say they don’t want the US to become more of a police state because they believe that counterterrorism techniques (which we use internationally) shouldn’t be used against the general population.

      The federal government has a habit of overstepping the rights and freedoms of the general public any time they feel like they are under attack. We saw this with 9/11 and the Patriot act. So I can see their reasoning even if I don’t agree that mass shooters should be considered terrorists under the law.

    • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      21 days ago

      Then we need to make him a saint.

      St. Luigi of Baltimore, forgive us our debts, deliver us from the greed of the wicked…

      • granolabar@kbin.melroy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        21 days ago

        They spent last 25 years deploying infrastructure for oppression because peasants have nothing to hide.

        I bet owner class is looking to test how good it is.

        The media blitz early is a fail but they got a lot of other tools.

        Did you see the drones bros!?

        Omg bro UFOs omg dont pay attention to dead CEO bro, trust me bro.

    • jaybone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      21 days ago

      I kind of think they don’t know what to do about this.

      It doesn’t seem smart for them to make him a martyr. Doesn’t seem smart to Epstein him.

      • Norin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        21 days ago

        I’ve been thinking for a few years now that, since no one with power ever seems to know what they’re doing, there’s something about power itself that makes the person who holds it selfish and incompetent.

      • SplashJackson@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        20 days ago

        Read the picture’s caption and tell me if any of the nouns used can be context for “they”, please.

  • YungOnions@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    116
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    21 days ago

    Because it’s about sending a message. They’ve seen how popular this guy and his actions have become and are trying to throw everything at him so it puts off any copycats.

    • Kalysta@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 days ago

      Except all they have done is make him a martyr, and now anyone who wants to be infamous is more likely to do something.

    • Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      21 days ago

      The death penalty has not been executed in NY/federal court for decades right? Doesn’t seem like an actual threat. What they want to achieve is a good negotiating position for a plea bargain because they known a trial will be a shitshow.

      • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        38
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        21 days ago

        Death penalty increases violence because murdering the person catching you becomes a way to increase your likelihood of surviving.

        • rickdg@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          21 days ago

          Death penalty backfires because it demonstrates fear for what this person keeps saying.

          • jaybone@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            21 days ago

            That would make him a martyr. I’m thinking the plan is to lock him up in max for life, then control the media narrative whenever his name comes up again.

            • granolabar@kbin.melroy.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              21 days ago

              Everyone who saw how this thing went down gonna have to spend their lives correcting false narratives they will weave.

              We didn’t do know for snowden, public opinion got split altht funny enough it seems people have came around on Snowden.

              Either way, luigi did not do anything wrong

        • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          24
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          21 days ago

          So basically, killing Luigi would not make copycats less likely, but it WOULD make it more likely for copycats to shoot CEOs AND cops?

          Hmm… The killing of Luigi itself would be awful, of course, but the consequences of it sound like a win to me 🤔

          • wolfpack86@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            19 days ago

            No, the death penalty increasing violence is about incentives.

            If I shoot someone dead and you are the only witness, I have a choice to make. If I do not want to be executed, killing you is the best chance for escaping punishment.

            The more severe the punishment the more desperate one will become to avoid it.

  • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    21 days ago

    And now that Republicans are set to have the Presidency, Congress and SCOTUS all at the same time, there doesn’t seem to be any barriers left.

    Abolish capital punishment!

    • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 days ago

      The feds also indicted him. There’s zero chance a Trump AG isn’t going to be pushing for the death penalty. What they cannot seem to understand is that this will only make him a martyr. They should have just given him the standard NY Murder II conviction any other killer would get, but they just couldn’t help themselves. They had to really send a message to the proles.

      All they will succeed in doing is elevating him to outright sainthood.

      • granolabar@kbin.melroy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        21 days ago

        They had to really send a message to the proles.

        They did, just not what they expected?

        Am I supposed to fear feds because I think Luigi if he did it, did nothing wrong?

        Or I suppose to fear them if I am gonna dpa. Copycat… I am pretty sure that guy would want luigi treatment… Kill me goverment while the working class talking about the topic I brought to the national level discussion.

        Also, I am not sure what’s up with the pictures. But luigis body language is of a man who is in control.

        They are the ones getting bent out of shape.

        Single payer or bust. The working class will need to get this done either now or in 25 years.

  • Random_Character_A@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    21 days ago

    An interesting factoid. In Finnish language “väkivalta” means violence. It is a combination word:

    väki = people, crowd, folk

    valta = power, reign

    • IsoKiero@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      21 days ago

      Väki also means (or at least used to) ‘power’ or ‘strong’ (väkivahva, väkijuoma…) and that’s also where the etymology for ‘väkivalta’ comes from. So it’s got nothing to do with people.

      • barsoap@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        21 days ago

        Valta also sounds like a Germanic loan just a second… yep. Same root as German “Gewalt”, violence, “walten”, to rule, preside, “verwalten”, to administer, also English wield.

        What’s it with Finnish. One third borrowed from Estonian, another third from the Swedes, the rest from the Sami.

    • dogsoahC@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 days ago

      So… in Finland “democracy” and “violence” are the same thing? xD

  • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    91
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 days ago

    The state of New York is about to get a firsthand lesson in the Streisand Effect. They should have just charged him the same charge any normal killer would get - Second Degree Murder, which is the normal charge for premeditated murder in NY. First degree requires rare special circumstances, and the prosecutor chose to use a dubious “terrorism” modifier to up the charge to Murder 1. They just couldn’t help themselves, and they shot themselves in the foot.

    The advantage to the prosecution to a simple Murder 2 charge is that motive really doesn’t matter much. They just have to prove that Luigi pulled the trigger. But with the terrorism modifier, the trial will no devolve into lengthy discussions about his motives and message. Not only have they now given him the world’s largest soapbox, but this will also give the defense an opportunity to make him much more sympathetic to the jury. With only a Murder 2 charge, the defense lawyer would have had to fight hard to sneak subtle hints into trial about Luigi’s motives. Now his motives will be a core part of the prosecution’s case.

    With a simple Murder 2 trial, even jurors who thought Thompson got what he deserved could vote to convict based simply on the letter of the law. Luigi killed an evil man, but he still has to face the consequences like any other criminal. Now the jury will clearly see that the system isn’t treating him like any other criminal. The prosecutors, through their own actions, are making Luigi’s case for him - the justice system is completely rigged in favor of the rich and powerful, and the only way they can ever be held accountable is through violence.

    All it takes is one juror of twelve to look around at the situation and say, “this is bullshit. I’m not going to convict.” Sure, they can try him again with a new jury if he’s not found unanimously not-guilty, but that jury will have an even greater risk of jury nullification. The longer this goes on, the more likely the prosecutor just has to offer him some sweetheart plea deal just to get him convicted of something. And each trial just elevates Mangione that much closer to literal Sainthood in the popular imagination.

    • smayonak@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      20 days ago

      It’s been mentioned before but NYC will be using special jury screening processes to make sure none of the jurors are “terrorist” sympathizers.

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      21 days ago

      Except in every step things can develop the ways you haven’t thought about.

      And courtroom shows are kinda common enough in movies and even in reality. People will have strong feelings, but this doesn’t seem a major thing for many.

      So - too much copium. I hope you are right and I am wrong, of course.

  • UncleGrandPa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    20 days ago

    “because their lives don’t matter as much as CEOs”

    This is the defining moment. This is our future

  • jaybone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    21 days ago

    Maybe they should charge his parents too, like they did with some other school shooters. But wait, his parents are rich and the other ones lived in trailer parks.

    • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      21 days ago

      He’s an adult. Parents get charged when they don’t properly secure their firearms from their minor child, which isn’t what is being alleged here. It’s not really comparable.