• 0 Posts
  • 25 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 19th, 2023

help-circle
  • abhibeckert@lemmy.worldtoMemes@lemmy.mlChat Apps
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    what’s wrong with just texting

    If you have friends in another country, it might cost a quarter every time you send a message.

    In regions of the world (e.g. Europe, and a lot of Asia) where some countries are the size of a large city (or perhaps the entire country is one city), that’s a problem. You’d be sending international texts all day every day.




  • they can’t fire you for wearing shorts.

    True, but they can disrespect you for failing to fit in with the corporate culture. Honestly, I’d rather be fired.

    There are plenty of workplaces where you can wear “whatever you want”, and I’m happy to work at one of those… But the clothes you choose to wear still has consequences. I can totally turn up to work in a full suit/tie/etc if I want. But I’d stick out like a sore thumb.


  • Look in a big box clothing store and you’ll see that the women’s section is almost always 2 to nearly 3x larger

    What do they sell in the men’s section? Genuinely curious because as a man I never shop for clothes…

    Years ago, I found a brand and model (yes, they have a model number) of pants that fit well and have lots of pockets. I have them in long/short, and black/blue/tan. I wear a uniform shirt at work (it’s totally optional, but about half the staff wear them and I find they puts me in “work mode” mentally). My partner buys my shirts, because she tolerates me owning half a dozen pairs of the same pants but will not tolerate it for shirts.

    My fashion choices are my shoes, my watch, my glasses, my phone, and my haircut. All four are the same every day but every six months or so I change one. That’s enough for me. I think it’s incredibly freeing to not have to worry about what I look like every day.







  • Threads already has over 30 million daily active users and growing fast - I’m tipping it will be over a billion in a year or two.

    The fediverse has 2 million monthly active users. Sorry, but we’ve already lost the content battle. Like it or not, Threads is king king and Lemmy/Mastodon are ants.

    Regarding “two taps and you’re signed up”… that’s just never going to happen. If anything, it probably needs to be a bit harder to sign up. We don’t want people using throwaway accounts.


  • Meta has practically unlimited resources. They will make access to the fediverse fast with their top tier servers.

    They absolutely have limits. For example Threads isn’t in the EU yet, because of strict controls that severely limit what Meta can do.

    As per my understanding this will make small instances less desirable to the common user.

    Small instances are already undesirable to the general public and always will be.

    Meta can and will unethically defedrate from instances which are a theat to them.

    No they can’t. The EU will only allow them to “ethically” defederate.

    When majority of the content is on the Meta servers they can and will provide fast access to it and unethically slow down access to the content from outside instances. This will be noticeable but cannot be proved

    If Threads is slow, people will switch to another service that is fast.

    This is just what i could think of, there are many more ways to be evil. Meta has the best engineers in the world who will figure out more discrete and impactful ways to harm the small instances.

    If they ask their best engineers to do something evil, most of them will quit. Why work for an evil corp when you can work almost anywhere you want?

    Also they don’t have the best in the world - those already left (or refused to work there in the first place).

    Privacy: I know they can scrape data from the fediverse right now. That’s not a problem. The problem comes when they launch their own Android / iOS app and collect data about my search and what kind of Camel milk I like.

    At least on iOS, that type of cross app tracking doesn’t work anymore (unless the user opts into it, which nobody ever does). Apple’s change to how tracking works is costing Meta billions of dollars… and protecting the privacy of about a billion people. Yay Apple.

    But more to the point, people who are worried about privacy will only install Threads if it’s the only way to reach thier friends/family. Since Threads will be federated, they won’t ahve that reason.

    I have Facebook and Facebook Messenger on my phone and once Threads is federated I will be enouraging all my friends to sign up for Threads, so I can reach them. If my Mastodon instance defederates Threads, I’ll be leaving that instance (Lemmy, on the other hand, I might not care so much).

    My thoughts: I think building our own userbase is better than federating with an evil corp.

    Better in what way? One of my metrics is being able to contact people who will not sign up for Mastodon.

    I love the fediverse specifically because it allows me to reach people on other instances. Defederating should be limited to harmful content (and I don’t see any evidence of harm in Thread).

    We couldn’t get the people to use Signal. This is our chance to make a change.

    Even I won’t use Signal. Talk to me when I can install it on both my phones, instead of just one of them (using the same account on both phones).


    Finishing on a more positive note - Threads is going to be full of ads. I think a lot of people won’t be OK with that… and if threads is federated, then people will sign up for small instances like this one. I think we’ll be fine.