Yes

That is a very interesting research area.

What he means is, your security considerations here must come from some perceived threat. What kind of threat do you forsee that requires this high level of security?

Usually when you consider security you start with a threat model, describing the scenarios you want to protect your systems from. And based on that you decide the necessary technical security measures that are relevant.

Norma who?

Who’s there?

Yes we should end winter

Did you see the report? Quite a lot of rockets fired from Gaza fails and hit somewhere in Gaza.

Mycroft is the closest thing I can think off.

My wife often praises my mother for having thought me from an early age that using the fabric scissors is a deadly sin.

This is showerthoughts, not stonerthoughts.

Sure. I did not mean to say the extend of them is equal in both countries. Just that neo-Nazism exists in both countries, and we are being blind if we simply ignore that it is a problem in Ukraine and their military.

Oh, there is no doubt Russia is much worse in the fascist regard. What I mean is we are beeing ignorant if we turn a blind to neo-Nazism also beeing a problem in Ukraine.

Especially when we are considering Ukraine joining NATO in the future. We need them to get rid of those parts of the military first.

Some ukranians are neo-nazis, also some in the military. Just like in Russia.

Record a video of yourself in the mirror telling yourself 10 kind things, and post it tomorrow.

Why are the eyes floating in mid air?

Pair it with solar panels, then it doesn’t contribute to climate change and you can run it as much as you want when the sun shines.

Because most people view it as morally wrong to kill another human.

Hey, I completely agree with you, in that the most interesting discussions are among groups where I don’t agree with everyone. This is where I learn and grow as a person.

But in saying that, aren’t you also saying that some people, like you and me, would not use such a database to filter out the users we do not agree with?

And would it not be a logical conclusion to make, that people who likes to build and stay in their echo chambers, would not be more inclined to listen to different opinions just because they don’t have a more efficient tool to sort out people they disagree with?

What I am saying is, all information that is technically available will be collected and analysed. Better make a public and open platform showing everything, such that everyone can see exactly what can be collected and surmised from the already public information, than to keep users blind from what information they actually leak publically.

Hey, I completely agree with you, in that the most interesting discussions are among groups where I don’t agree with everyone. This is where I learn and grow as a person.

But in saying that, aren’t you also saying that some people, like you and me, would not use such a database to filter out the users we do not agree with?

And would it not be a logical conclusion to make, that people who likes to build and stay in their echo chambers, would not be more inclined to listen to different opinions just because they don’t have a more efficient tool to sort out people they disagree with?

What I am saying is, all information that is technically available will be collected and analysed. Better make a public and open platform showing everything, such that everyone can see exactly what can be collected and surmised from the already public information, than to keep users blind from what information they actually leak publically.

I am curious. Do you believe that humans has always had the option to not eat animals?

What I am asking is, is there some point during the evolution of homo sapience where it shifted from being morally acceptable to being morally wrong to eat other animals?