And charged how many times?

It’s not. History never is and it’d be worth understanding how we got to this place.

It’s actually spewing tire and brake particles everywhere. It’s responsible for 30% of microplastics in our environment. It should not be anywhere near our main mode of transportation in the future.

The problem here is that you don’t know how deep their role was. Nothing is being made up. Pope John XXIII even wrote about the role Catholic antisemitism played in the lead up to the Holocaust.

https://origins.osu.edu/history-news/catholic-church-and-holocaust?language_content_entity=en

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catholic_Church_and_Judaism

lol fat chance, keep dreaming idiot

You ever convert a Nazi with words? You certainly haven’t convinced me that a Nazi puncher and a Nazi are the same.

Not defending paper straws specifically but recycling is a scam. Anything common household material that is not plastic is inherently better than plastic from an environmental standpoint.

Ohh wow you are very smart

I’m sorry I didn’t realize I was talking to an idiot. That’s my bad. That’s on me.

“You, person who opposes Nazi ideology, would ackshually support it” Brilliant detective work there pal.

Edit: Also wanted to add but was busy. The Nazi party never achieved anything close to majority support. They peaked at 37% and were declining to 33% during the last free and fair election. No one likes Nazis. Not even Germans in the 30s and 40s.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazi_Party_election_results

The deep divisiveness comes from the shitty ideas that should have been shunned long ago and instead were left to fester.

You don’t care about instances loke Exploding Heads or their awful ideas because you’re unaffected by them so you can hold these lofty perfect ideals instead of facing the reality of the situation.

Opposing and shunning hate speech is not fascism and your argument depends on pretending to be unable to see the difference between hate and disagreement.

Allow me to illucidate the simplicity of this in reality:

• Economic policy: Disagreement
• Minstrel show images: Hate speech
• Energy policy: Disagreement
• Saying men and straight people should have less rights than women and gays: Hate speech

No it doesn’t. This argument works only if you assume that “intolerance” is something that can be defined as “anyone against anything I’m doing”.

If fascists were able to say “they’re being oppressive of my desire to exclude them from our society” then that’s not a flaw in the paradox but their reasoning abilities. Any philosophy is irrelevant then.

The argument boils down to “it’s impossible to know if the opposing side is truly being intolerant.” You say it is impossible. I say it isn’t.

It’s called the paradox of tolerance. Tolerating intolerance is the paradox. So it says you can’t tolerate intolerance.

Okay you clearly haven’t understood it.

What’s the most number of days a person has not pooped and survived?

You simultaneously reject it and believe he wrote it to prove how unsustainable it is?

You’re entirely wrong. No ideas need to be shared where people don’t want to hear them. You are free to speak and I am free to not listen. It’s truly a beautiful approach.

Edit: I’d also like to add that the paradox Popper is referring to is that of tolerating intolerance. That’s the paradox.

This is exactly the space for creating all sorts of spaces. No one needs to federate with you here. It’s up to instance owners and there’s plenty of instances.

Nazi trash can stay entirely off any instance that I’m on and if they show up and nothing is done I’ll go elsewhere. Period.

You could read Karl Popper’s The Paradox of Tolerance.

There’s no need to debate Nazism or Fascism with Nazis and Fascists. The education on it should come from historians and those otherwise educated in it.

When we censor Nazis we win. When we let them into our spaces we lose.