• toofpic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    There was an architect, Le Corbusier. He was a socialist, so his projects of future cities involved a lot of public spaces where people spend their free and working time, while a person’s home was just a small area for sleeping and eating breakfast. The Soviets took the idea of small personal homes, and dropped the “nice public areas” part.

    • It’s cold in the winter because the walls are quite thin
    • You can hear your neighbours loudly speaking
    • I was lucky to have a normal-sized room in a later “Brezhnevka” house, but many of my classmates had rooms (if they had a separate room at all) where you had a bed, a cupboard+desk combo, and a chair in the middle, that you have to remove to get to the window. Japan-sized stuff.

    Speaking of Le Corbusier, as his main (I know, that’s subjective) achievement was a technical approach to ergonomics - all sizes in his projects were based on human sizes and proportions. Meaning that a height of a ceiling is a height of an average adult man raising his hands, + some space. It worked, and it’s cost-effective, but you really like some extra space, and have more than 3 sq.m. toilet.

    • SSJMarx@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      dropped the “nice public areas” part

      ehhh for the most part this wasn’t true until after the fall of the socialist system. All of the funding for the upkeep of public spaces got dropped, you see.

    • sunzu@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      All fair criticism and that’s why I prefer to have 600k visiable homeless in the US with likely another 1 million living in their cars.

      SInce you knew all of this would also know All of this is fixable with modern technique and extra investment.

      You would also know that north American style construction with shiti wood frame for both houses and apts are a lot worse for noise . Furthermore they only gotten properly insulated for in the 1990s so all the stock prior to that is beyond inefficient.

      Literally boomer 2mmilion mcmension and you still hear guy walking upstairs…

      Like wtf y’all paying for

      • toofpic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        Oh yes, I’ve heard of (but haven’t experienced myself) a low quality of a “standard” us house, but personally I really value the amount of space over many things. When the covid started, we rented a shitty thin-walled summerhouse to get out of the 5M city and keep some freedom of movement. And it was so awesome I didn’t care how much firewood we burned, or how I could hear the kids through 2 walls. Because I could step out of the door and still stay within “my territory”, my place. And in most of small apartments, not just the soviet ones, you feel trapped in those 2 or 3 concrete boxes you call home.
        And if you build a house for yourself, you have a chance to make use of all the modern technologies, and some things are not that much more expensive - I know because I did plan to do it, and I even have a giant excel file with calculations and choices made. Never happened because we moved to another country.

        • sunzu@kbin.run
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          5 months ago

          There is value in space and you get means it, any no thing.

          We sure as fuck don’t have a shortage of luxury inventory lol

          But sound proofing us style construction is nearly impossible is my understanding due to structural studs running across floors and passing sound and concrete structures are not economical. Not sure how true this is though.

    • ThunderclapSasquatch@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Oh god I already feel claustrophobic knowing everything in that tiny space would be made for people half a foot shorter than me, it’d be living in that fucking RV all over again

      • toofpic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        If you’re tall, then yes, it won’t be pleasurable as well. Especially sad because houses of earlier Stalin period were awesome. It doesn’t make Stalin any better, and he wasn’t solving the problem of overpopulation by building houses (sad joke), but the houses from tgat period are well built, have high ceilings, thick walls, sometimes nice things like second entrances and garbage chutes, etc. This was connected with the industrial and economical boom after the war (so, generally the same stuff that happened in the us, only in the us people got a bigger piece of pie).
        I converted the heights for you:

        • Khruschevka ceiling: 2,5m, 8,2ft
        • Stalinka ceilings - 3-4m, 9,8-13.1ft
        • uis@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Especially sad because houses of earlier Stalin period were awesome

          There is nothing to be sad because houses of earlier Stalin period were not for people, but for nomenclature.

            • sunzu@kbin.run
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              Each city had them but as guy above said, they were for the party members and you had to be decently well ranked to get a stalin style apartment. they were deff luxury.