• Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Explain to me why Americans can’t have single payer because “ToO eXpENsIve”

    But we can fund Israel’s single payer no problem.

    This is why I wish “America First” wasn’t a racist dogwhistle.

    I would be onboard with a platform where America stops getting involved in other nations bullshit for War Profiteering reasons and just took care of its own people.

      • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I believe it does, I think I remember reading that somewhere, but it would have been years ago, so I wouldn’t be comfortable betting my life on that.

      • DarthBueller@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        No. Military in-kind assistance only since 2007. Before that, substantial financial assistance from 1971 to 2007.

        • imposedsensation@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Money is substitutable. It’s laughable when politicians earmark funds for only a specific purpose or only provide supplies and equipment.

          If those are things that the recipient would otherwise spend money to buy, then you’re supporting whatever other things they end up spending the money to buy.