• ox0r@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    They’re an ally because they kill slightly browner people

  • Throwaway@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    30
    ·
    1 year ago

    Because they’re actually friendly? Compared to almost everyone else aside from Qatar, they’re downright helpful.

    All relative of course.

    • DarthBueller@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why you are being downvoted is beyond me. People’s lack of understanding of the middle east is profound. Easier to hate on Israel with barely veiled antisemitism than take a moment to understand that Israel is politically diverse, and that the religious whackos on BOTH SIDES fuck everything up for everyone. There was a cute arab israeli fellow student that was sweet on me when I was studying ethnicity and national violence in Israel/Palestine. My Christian arab israeli friend warned me not to talk to her, because (points to a group of guys that always looked like they want to murder me) those guys are Muslim Brotherhood and nearly beat to death the last guy that tried to go on a date with her. Even though she wasn’t observant, didn’t wear a head scarf, etc. Yitzak Rabin was murdered by the ultra orthodox. Instead, it’s “Israelis bad, Palestinians good.” It’s fucking ridiculous. Does Netanyahu blow goats? Yes. Does that justify blind support of Palestine? Fuck no.

  • outstanding_bond@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not a huge fan of the Israel situation but it does seem like they often stay out at the US’s request:

    During the 1990–1991 Gulf War, Iraq carried out a missile campaign against Israel, in which it launched 42 modified Scud missiles (designated Al-Hussein) at Israeli cities with the strategic objective of provoking Israel into launching retaliatory attacks and potentially jeopardizing the multinational coalition formed by the United States against Iraq, which had full backing and extensive contributions from other Muslim-majority states; Israel did not respond to the Iraqi missile attacks due to American pressure, and Iraq failed to gather support for its occupation of Kuwait.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq–Israel_relations

    • Kaped@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Dont look up double citizens in the congress. Cant send your own people to die lmao

  • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Explain to me why Americans can’t have single payer because “ToO eXpENsIve”

    But we can fund Israel’s single payer no problem.

    This is why I wish “America First” wasn’t a racist dogwhistle.

    I would be onboard with a platform where America stops getting involved in other nations bullshit for War Profiteering reasons and just took care of its own people.

      • DarthBueller@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        No. Military in-kind assistance only since 2007. Before that, substantial financial assistance from 1971 to 2007.

        • imposedsensation@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Money is substitutable. It’s laughable when politicians earmark funds for only a specific purpose or only provide supplies and equipment.

          If those are things that the recipient would otherwise spend money to buy, then you’re supporting whatever other things they end up spending the money to buy.

      • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I believe it does, I think I remember reading that somewhere, but it would have been years ago, so I wouldn’t be comfortable betting my life on that.

  • hakase@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah, because there definitely isn’t a reason why Israel sending troops to other Middle Eastern countries would be a bad idea. It’s definitely just because they’re a bad ally.

      • DarthBueller@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        That is literally the reason, not sure why you “/s” flagged it. The USA would still support Israel without the American evangelicals because of the large jewish population of the USA, but Israel would have a much more conciliatory approach toward the Palestinians.

    • BubblyMango@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      It gives it control over the area by keeping israel dependent on the US. Part of why the US actually wants the conflicts at the area to remain. This is basically the cold war phase 2.