• ParsnipWitch@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The sad thing is, if we want life as we know it (that includes horses happily munching on grass) to continue existing, humans are it’s only shot.

    It might be edgy and cool to wish humanity would go instinct, but with it, potentially all life will go instinct.

    • SmoothIsFast@citizensgaming.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean not really once costal areas flood and the locations best for growing food change we will see massive issues with humanity surviving, the rest of the ecosystem would adapt, migrate and evolve to survive. Hell even chernobyl basically shows us even if we went the full nuclear option wildlife would bounce back better than before with just maybe shortened life expectancies. We are a lot more prone to die from changes than the wildlife on this planet is.

      • ParsnipWitch@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Short term, yes, no question. But long term (a million years and beyond) we look at different challenges life on earth will face.

        It’s a fact that it won’t simply continue existing indefinitely. And definitely not in the diversity we know now. It’s not likely for rabbits or another species to suddenly rise up to the task of inventing space travel. That would need way more time than what it takes for earth to be hit by an asteroid big enough so that life won’t bounce back. The same goes for other types of mass extinction. Only humans have at least a slight chance to make life endure beyond earth.