• Stamets [Mirror]@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Honestly? Thanks for the disclaimer. Was really unsure how to feel about it at first. However… I agree. Want representation for everyone but the acronym does seem to change pretty frequently yet always leaves someone out somehow. I’ve honestly given up trying to keep track and just call everyone who isn’t straight and cis part of the “Rainbow Spectrum” or the “Rainbow Coalition”. I personally live on the corner of Magenta and Pink.

    • Acinonyx@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      if the ‘+’ includes every not mentioned gender/sexuality anyways, why can’t we just say ‘L+’?

      • Stamets [Mirror]@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Because then it doesn’t feel like equal representation for everyone. It feels like Lesbians are getting the most representation with everyone being an after thought. While lesbians are awesome, it does feel shitty for everyone else. That’s why so many additions have been made. It doesn’t feel representative of everyone or equal. Also why I throw the whole thing out and just call us all something else. No one gets specific representation but it goes back to the original meaning of the Pride flag. Every color in equal representation, showing the diversity of us all and how we all deserve to be seen and heard.

        Good question though!

        • Acinonyx@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Also why I throw the whole thing out and just call us all something else.

          true equality would either be just ‘+’, without any letters, or including every letter, which seems impossible.

          or like you said, something completely else. I personally like - hear me out - ‘alphabet people’. I understand that rightoids use this term as an insult so it isn’t usable, which is a shame, because apart from its negative connotation it has a few nice upsides:

          • sexualities/genders are being abbreviated by single letters already and since the alphabet contains all letters, everyone is included

          • ‘people’ is completely neutral towards everyone as well

    • OneWomanCreamTeam@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is why I’ve always preferred the term GSRM: Gender, Sexual, and Romantic Minorities. It’s fully inclusive without ballooning out to an absurd size. I see no signs that it will see common use in the near future though.