AI hiring tools may be filtering out the best job applicants

As firms increasingly rely on artificial intelligence-driven hiring platforms, many highly qualified candidates are finding themselves on the cutting room floor.

  • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    Almost certainly true.

    But how does it compare to HR hiring staff doing the same?

    There are those guys that take the x number of applicants off the top of the stack and discard the rest because “they’re unlucky.”

    Now i can hear the screams already. AI is programmed with bias and arbitrary bullshit might be less objectionable.

    The reality is the ai is programmed by the HR staff. And inherits their bias any how; but at least an AI can be made to ignore race on the face of it, where humans that are racist can’t.

    • pine@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Nah. They just inheret the racial biases the hr have through correlation. Associations based on zipcode or name. But this time it’s an inscrutable black box being racist.

      • Deello@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Here is some dark timeline thoughts. Companies are people, patents and copyright can only be given to humans, AI hallucinates, companies are responsible for the actions of AI.

        Does this mean we will eventually have to compete with commercial AI personas that also have a verifiable work history complete with an itemized list of financial liability incidents. HR now has to decide if they want a human employee or an AI employee.

      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        It isn’t necessarily inscrutable.

        It will be, almost certainly. But for many, the entire reason is to try and remove it, so it won’t have their name, and maybe not their zip code as a considered factor.

        This will depend very much on the organization in question- which gets to my point. There’s some high level bullshit that many applicants never get through just because.

        Race. Zip code. Name. They just don’t have to be used.

        Or more complicated… college from where the got degrees. If an applicant graduated from an HBC it’s a not bad bet that they’re… black. Or at least “woke”. On the other hand, some one who graduated from some deeply conservative college is almost certainly a conservative.

        A human is going to make those connections regardless. An AI can be made to not even know there is a connection

    • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      There are those guys that take the x number of applicants off the top of the stack and discard the rest because “they’re unlucky.”

      Fuck my blood boils whenever I think about that incident.

    • Deestan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      Yeah, AI is in reality not competing with perfect.

      Though I do think it will do worse than run-of-the-mill HR, as HR people are almost certainly incapable of competently training an AI.

    • Tja@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      AI is programmed by the HR staff

      Yes, those famous elite code wizards, the guys and gals in HR.

      • bl4ckblooc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        If firms are the ones using AI, then it isn’t even HR wizards. It’s the geniuses that can manage to pick out the right candidate for a job even though they know nothing about the position, company, location, candidates, or work load.

        They are already throwing out your best candidates because they don’t know what they are doing, but their firm costs less than a couple HR people so the share holders still think it’s a good idea.

      • cynar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        10 months ago

        While they are not doing the coding, they are often providing the training data. This is what screws the process over. Garbage in, garbage out.