• Enkrod@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Then it’s not tea, it’s an infusion or decoction.

      Tea is made from a specific plant, the tea shrub (Camellia sinensis).

      These infusions might be called tea, but they are tea in the same way as a hotdog is a heated companionable mammal.

      Except if you talk about Kukicha, then it’s made from the stems of the tea shrub. The important part here is the tea shrub. Without tea in it, it just ain’t tea.

      • Dasus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Technically, these are all decoctions, and “decoction of tea (the plant)” has become just “tea”, which is now colloquially replaced “decoction”.

        So in the sense I was using tea, as a replacement for “decoction”, coffee is a “tea”, insofar that the replaced word, “decoction”, boiled plant matter drink.

        Language isn’t quite as black as white as we’d sometimes wish it was.

        So you’re not wrong, per se, but neither am I.

      • woelkchen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Asian cultures called various hot beverages tea 茶 before some Westerner decided that they are wrong. Sure there is green tea from that plant but Asian cultures also had mint or chrysanthemum tea using the same 茶 character (pudina chai in India for mint tea).

        If anything, the Westerner who decided that beverages made from only that specific shrub is called tea was the wrong one. Broader uses predate your definition.