Don’t worry everyone, I’m sure someone somewhere is worse and that makes this okay somehow.

  • Luccus@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    I mean that someone saw hostile architecture and then decided to photoshop a trans flag over it for political reasons.

    We, as strangers, will never know their exact motivation, but I think if their idea was a message regarding the unfair treatment of economically disadvantaged people or neoliberal hypocrisy, there would be much better ways to communicate the issue, that don’t involve something that can easily be construed as anti-trans messaging.

    It’s a bit vibes based, but you know… people ain’t robots, and even if that wasn’t the original intent, that’s how the message comes across. And I’d rather have a better, more poignant statement that’s worth repeating, rather than this, perhaps unintentionally, bad one.

    Especially because people will take this at face value and there are more photoshopped images just like this, making the whole thing a bit sussy, imo.

    • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yeah, that’s not a reasonable interpretation. Intersectionality and criticism of lack of same is by far the most likely intent behind this picture.

      Pretending otherwise kinda seems like grasping at straws to avoid addressing the shortcomings of your favorite neoliberals.

      • Luccus@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        My “favorite neoliberal”?

        I’m an entire person, not a single-sided strawman. I edited my reply to also state that I think neolibs suck too, if that helps to unflatten my thoughts on this a bit. And because I think they do.

        I’d also like to add that I’ve seen this image and others like it posted in anti-progressive groups by anti-progressive people, instilling exactly the message I explained earlier. Which is why I say the message either isn’t clear, or just bad.

        I don’t feel like I’m “gasping at straws”. I feel my argument is somewhat reasonable and I hope my point is a little clearer now.

        I have to go back to work now.

        • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          8 months ago

          I still believe that your interpretation is unreasonable and mine is much more likely regardless of your anecdotal experience in anti-progressive groups, but I apologize for unfairly assuming bad intent on your part. Have a nice day!

    • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      If I had to take a guess at the motivations, I think someone saw the spikes as well as the equality sign in the window and took a picture because that’s kinda a juxtaposition. But I’m guessing that didn’t give enough “zing” that would be noticed as an internet post, so they edited the trans flag on the spikes to make it less subtle.